Re: [ovirt-users] Building vdsm within Fedora

Il 24/09/2014 09:44, Sven Kieske ha scritto: > > On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote: >> You probably missed the first part "we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in >> the spec file". In that case you won't fail in any requirement. >> >> Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6 before >> committing http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214 ? Federico: as we checked a few minutes ago, it seems there's no problem in requiring qemu-kvm/qemu-img in the spec file. Only issue is that if non rhev version is installed a manual "yum update" is required for moving to the rhevm version.

> Of course there was a problem, please follow the link in this very > commit to the according bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127763 > > In short: you can not use live snapshots without this updated spec file. > > And it's a PITA to install this package by hand, you must track > it's versions yourself etc pp. you basically lose all the stuff > a proper spec file gives you. Well, since the -rhev package is now available in 3.4, 3.5 and master repos it shouldn't be a PITA anymore. > PS: I also don't get the "we want to get vdsm in every distribution" > a) it was never in any distro, it was in epel, which is a third party > repository anyway, so you can just provide it via ovirt repo imho. > b) no one packages vdsm for debian, ubuntu, gentoo, arch, suse, > $nameyourdistro or I completely missed it, so why treat fedora > in a special way? Don't misunderstand me, it would be cool if you > have packages for every distro, or even bsd based stuff, but I think > this is still a long way. > c) will anyone use vdsm without ovirt? is this even possible? > so imho you need ovirt repos anyway? > > >