Thank you.
The mention of Fedora then should be removed from the release notes, maybe
even stating that it's not recommended?
On 11/30/2017 4:21 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Blaster <Blaster(a)556nato.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is Fedora not supported anymore?
>>
>> I've read the release notes for the 4.2r2 beta and 4.1.7, they mention
>> specific versions of RHEL and CentOS, but only mention Fedora by name,
>> with
>> no specific version information.
>
> We currently have too many problems with fedora to call it even 'Technical
> Preview', as was done in the past.
>
> You can still use the nightly snapshots, and most things work,
> more-or-less,
> with some issues having known workarounds. See e.g.:
>
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1460625&hide_re...
>
> And also:
>
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2017-August/030990.html
>
> (not sure that one is still relevant for Fedora 27, didn't check
> recently).
>
>> On 11/15/2017 9:17 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote
>>
>>
>> This release is available now on x86_64 architecture for:
>>
>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later
>>
>> * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later
>>
>>
>> This release supports Hypervisor Hosts on x86_64 and ppc64le
>> architectures
>> for:
>>
>> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later
>>
>> * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later
>>
>> * oVirt Node 4.2 (available for x86_64 only)
>>
>>
tp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>