Re: [Users] save to restart libvirtd ?

Monday, 15 April 2013

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000503080808040106050307
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks Martin,

I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all 
went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after 
restarting libvirtd :) ..

I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could 
have grown this big :\

Thanks
Alex

On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
...
 On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
>
 Hi,

 for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users(a)redhat.com, but for
 this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
 enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
 being ran.

 Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
 single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
 your machines.

 Have a nice day,
 Martin 
--------------000503080808040106050307
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <font size="-1"><font face="Tahoma">Thanks
Martin,<br>
        <br>
        I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it
        seemed all went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB
        of memory after restarting libvirtd :) .. <br>
        <br>
        I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it
        could have grown this big :\ <br>
        <br>
        Thanks<br>
        Alex<br>
        <br>
      </font></font><br>
    On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:516C18E3.1000908@redhat.com"
type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">Hi,

I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?

</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Hi,

for libvirt questions, I'd rather use <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com">libvirt-users@redhat.com</a>,
but for
this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
being ran.

Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
your machines.

Have a nice day,
Martin
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>

--------------000503080808040106050307--

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Re: [Users] save to restart libvirtd ?