Le 13/09/2014 17:34, Nir Soffer a écrit :
> For God's sake, please, prevent "secondary" storage
> other than the master, especially iso and export) to completely block
> the whole thing when being unavailable.
> To many users suffered from this in the last two years I participate at
> this mailing list (including me).
I think this is true for ISO and export domains for some time.
In 3.4 at least, this is still true and is a problem.
At least, if we can get rid of this and just mark these iso and export
domains as unusable, and still do every other non-related operations,
this would be very useful.
It will not work for data domains - if you have vms with disks on
call "secondary" data domain, how would you migrate these vms to a host that
cannot see the "secondary" domain?
In 3.6, there will be no "master" domain, so any data domain will be important
as any other data domain.
Maybe what do you like is to have more control on which domains are critical,
and which are not. A domain which you mark as "non-critical", or
will not cause the host to become non-operational when the host cannot see
So you would not be able to migrate some vms to a host that cannot see the
secondary domain, but since *you* marked it as "secondary", it is not a
What do you think?
This proposition is perfect.
I don't know whether being able to mark some storage domain as more
precious than other will be useful, when their absence won't be a