3:51 a.m.
Hi Dan, guys
Sorry for very late follow-up, but we had a lot of other topics to fix just before to go
back on this one.
We have tried another approach just to check if the kernel of the vdsm iso image used to
install the host could create the problem I've reported to the list.
Now we have reinstalled the same hardware with latest CentOS 7.1, fully updated.
Installed vdsm, then joined the oVirt cluster.
Well, we are observing the same behavior as before.
No DHCP offer is reaching the booting VM, and:
brctl showmacs <bridge_if> show us the booting vm mac-address
tcpdump -I <bridge_if> show us the dhcp offer coming from dhcp server.
We have also tried to remove ANY firewall rule.
It isn't a PXE issue (gPXE 0.9.7) but only a DHCP process issue. Infact, if we install
a vm manually and assign a static IP, it works fine.
If we switch to dhcp, the vm don't get the dynamic one.
In this case, tcpdump on vm shows only the DHCP discovery, not the DHCP offer.
Any further suggestion/hint ?
RN
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Dan Kenigsberg [mailto:danken@redhat.com]
Inviato: lunedì 18 maggio 2015 16:14
A: NUNIN Roberto
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org; ibarkan(a)redhat.com
Oggetto: Re: R: [ovirt-users] R: PXE boot of a VM on vdsm don't read DHCP
offer
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:11:25PM +0200, NUNIN Roberto wrote:
> Hi Dan
> Thanks for answering
>
>
>
> > Which kernel does the el7 host run? I think that Ido has seen a case
> > where `brctl showmacs` was not populated with the VM mac, despite a
> > packet coming out of it.
>
> Kernel is: 3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64, package is vdsm only. Brctl isn't
available within vdsm only package.
Could you try upgrading to a more up-to-date
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-
7/7.1.1503/updates/x86_64/Packages/kernel-3.10.0-
229.4.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
?
bridge-utils is a vdsm dependency. It must exist on your host. Please
see if the mac of the vNIC shows up on `brctl showmacs` as it should.
> >
> > Can you tcpdump and check whether the bridge propogated the DHCP
offer
> > to the tap device of the said VM? Does the packet generated by
> > `ether-wake MAC-of-VM` reach the tap device?
>
> Yes: host "see" the broadcast :
> 0.000000 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 DHCP 346
DHCP
Discover - Transaction ID 0x69267b67
> It came from the right MAC:
> Source: Qumranet_15:81:03 (00:1a:4a:15:81:03)
> And it is tagged correctly:
> 802.1Q Virtual LAN, PRI: 0, CFI: 0, ID: 3500
>
> This is the offer, on the bond interface:
> 1.012355 10.155.124.2 10.155.124.246 DHCP 346
DHCP
Offer - Transaction ID 0x69267b67
> Layer 2 info:
> Ethernet II, Src: Cisco_56:83:c3 (84:78:ac:56:83:c3), Dst:
Qumranet_15:81:03 (00:1a:4a:15:81:03)
> Tagging on the bond:
> 802.1Q Virtual LAN, PRI: 0, CFI: 0, ID: 3500
>
> The tag is correctly removed when DHCP offer is forwarded over the
bond.3500.
> Here's the offer content, seems everything right:
>
> Client IP address: 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0)
> Your (client) IP address: 10.155.124.246 (10.155.124.246)
> Next server IP address: 10.155.124.223 (10.155.124.223)
> Relay agent IP address: 10.155.124.2 (10.155.124.2)
> Client MAC address: Qumranet_15:81:03 (00:1a:4a:15:81:03)
> Client hardware address padding: 00000000000000000000
> Server host name: 10.155.124.223
> Boot file name: pxelinux.0
> Magic cookie: DHCP
>
> Nothing of this offer appear on the VM side.
But does it show on the host's bridge? on the tap device?
>
> ether-wake -i bond0.3500 00:1a:4a:15:81:03 (started from the host)
> reach the VM eth0 interface:
> 2.002028 HewlettP_4a:47:b0 Qumranet_15:81:03 WOL 116
MagicPacket for Qumranet_15:81:03 (00:1a:4a:15:81:03)
>
> Really strange behavior.
>
> Roberto
Questo messaggio e' indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato e potrebbe
contenere informazioni confidenziali, riservate o proprietarie. Qualora la presente
venisse ricevuta per errore, si prega di segnalarlo immediatamente al mittente,
cancellando l'originale e ogni sua copia e distruggendo eventuali copie cartacee. Ogni
altro uso e' strettamente proibito e potrebbe essere fonte di violazione di legge.
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,
or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the
sender immediately, deleting the original and all copies and destroying any hard copies.
Any other use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.