Re: [Users] Features requests for the setup/configuration utilities - feedback requested

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:44:48 +0002 Alex Lourie <alourie(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Jiri > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jiri Belka <jbelka(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> I'll talk about RHEVM but it's probably related to oVirt too. >> >> As rhevm installs all deps, I'm curious why versionlock.list is >> populated after rhevm-setup and _not_dirrectly during installation >> (maybe because you would need to hardcode versions into rhevm >> package?). It took me tens of minutes to figure out why is upgrade >> working differently now, just because I did _NOT_ do rhevm-setup after >> clean install because I was thinking I know what files are important >> and was restoring them from a tarball. >> >> I think running rhevm-setup if you just want to restore is stupid. If >> we would know 100% which files are involved, just install, restore >> from >> backup, restore DB should be sufficient, without loosing time with >> rhevm-setup which just writes there and here... :) >> > > I don't really follow you here. What are you restoring with rhevm-setup? My previous (wrong) procedure to restore old version was: rhevm-cleanup, yum remove rhevm\*, rm -rf $dirs, yum install rhevm\*, tar xvzpf /backup.tgz, ./restore.sh for DB... which was not fully correct as I haven't known /etc/yum/plugin.d/versionlock.list is touched by rhevm-setup as well and thus yum was working very strange during next normal upgrade. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users