I have a question for the developers: Why use gluster? Why not Pacemaker or something with better performance stats? Just curious. Eric Evans Digital Data Services LLC. 304.660.9080 From: Joop <jvdwege(a)xs4all.nl&gt; Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:43 AM To: Satheesaran Sundaramoorthi <sasundar(a)redhat.com>; users(a)ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available for testing On 13-4-2020 09:45, Satheesaran Sundaramoorthi wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:37 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com> > wrote: Does the hyperconverged installation now work with glusterfs? I tested alpha/beta1/2 and the latter won't get past the storage step. Not yet. There was the issue with glusterfs storage domain and storage domain blocksize probe check. This is addressed with a new ioprocess-1.4.1 package for the bug[1]. We are testing currently with this fix and it works well. But hitting yet another issue, where Hosted Engine deployment fails at the very last stage in the deployment. Gluster developer is looking in to it, as I respond here. Soon we will have a working build and I will let you once these issues are settled. [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820283 Thanks, sas Thanks for the message. Looking through the logs I saw references to the blocksize but since that is contained in the ansible scripts which get downloaded to the host I gave up finding the source versions to try to see it I could get it going beyond that failing step. Anyway, thanks for informing me, Regards, Joop

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Ovirt an HA cluster? I assume pacemaker would be for specific apps like httpd or database, correct? Gluster is more of a distributed file system. I'm just wondering with the performance complaints with gluster if there wouldn't be a better solution. Just thinking out loud. Eric Evans Digital Data Services LLC. 304.660.9080 -----Original Message----- From: Uwe Laverenz <uwe(a)laverenz.de&gt; Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:57 PM To: users(a)ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available for testing Hi Eric, Am 13.04.20 um 18:15 schrieb eevans(a)digitaldatatechs.com: if I'm not mistaken, these two have different purposes: gluster(fs) is a distributed storage software and pacemaker is for resource management of HA cluster systems. regards, Uwe _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/33JKX6SNGJZ...