Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Ovirt an HA cluster? I assume pacemaker would be
for specific apps like httpd or database, correct? Gluster is more of a distributed file
system. I'm just wondering with the performance complaints with gluster if there
wouldn't be a better solution.
Just thinking out loud.
Digital Data Services LLC.
From: Uwe Laverenz <uwe(a)laverenz.de>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:57 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available for testing
Am 13.04.20 um 18:15 schrieb eevans(a)digitaldatatechs.com:
I have a question for the developers: Why use gluster? Why not
Pacemaker or something with better performance stats?
if I'm not mistaken, these two have different purposes: gluster(fs) is a distributed
storage software and pacemaker is for resource management of HA cluster systems.
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement:
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/