8:48 a.m.
Hello All,
I am about deploying a new Ovirt system for our developers that we plan to
be hyperconverged environment Node based.
The system workload would be mostly used for builders that compiling our
code , which involves with lots of small files and intensive IO.
I plan to build two glustered volume "layers" one based on sas drives for
OS spin on, and second for Nvme based for intensive IO.
I would expect that the system will be resilient/high availability and in
the same time give enough good IO request for vm builders that will be at
least 6 to 8 vm guests.
The system hardware would be as follows:
*chassis*: 4x HP DL380 gen8
*each server hardware:*
*cpu*: 2x e5-2690v2
*memory*:256GB
*Disks*:12x 1.2TB sas 10k disks , 2 mirror for os (or using usk kingstone
2x 128gb mirror) rest for vm os volume.
*Nvme*: 2x960GB Kingstone KC1000 for builders compiling source code
*Network: *4 ports Intel 10Gbit/s SFP +
Given above configuration and theory, my question would be what would be
best practice in terms of Gluster configuration
*Distributed,Replicated,Distributed
Replicated,Dispersed,Distributed Dispersed*?
What is the suggestion for hardware raid type 5 or 6 , or use ZFS?
Network nodes communication , i intend to use 3 ports for storage
communication and one port for guests network , my question regarding
Gluster inter communication , what is better would i gail from 3x 10G LACP
or 1 network for each gluster volume?
Please advice
Thanks
--
Tal Bar-or
8:14 a.m.
New subject: Advice on deploying oVirt hyperconverged environment Node based
cc'ing Denis and Sahina,
Perhaps they can share their expirience and insights with the hyperconverged
environment.
Regards,
Maor
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Tal Bar-Or <tbaror(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,
I am about deploying a new Ovirt system for our developers that we plan to
be hyperconverged environment Node based.
The system workload would be mostly used for builders that compiling our
code , which involves with lots of small files and intensive IO.
I plan to build two glustered volume "layers" one based on sas drives for
OS spin on, and second for Nvme based for intensive IO.
I would expect that the system will be resilient/high availability and in
the same time give enough good IO request for vm builders that will be at
least 6 to 8 vm guests.
The system hardware would be as follows:
*chassis*: 4x HP DL380 gen8
*each server hardware:*
*cpu*: 2x e5-2690v2
*memory*:256GB
*Disks*:12x 1.2TB sas 10k disks , 2 mirror for os (or using usk kingstone
2x 128gb mirror) rest for vm os volume.
*Nvme*: 2x960GB Kingstone KC1000 for builders compiling source code
*Network: *4 ports Intel 10Gbit/s SFP +
Given above configuration and theory, my question would be what would be
best practice in terms of Gluster configuration *Distributed,Replicated,Distributed
Replicated,Dispersed,Distributed Dispersed*?
What is the suggestion for hardware raid type 5 or 6 , or use ZFS?
Network nodes communication , i intend to use 3 ports for storage
communication and one port for guests network , my question regarding
Gluster inter communication , what is better would i gail from 3x 10G LACP
or 1 network for each gluster volume?
Please advice
Thanks
--
Tal Bar-or
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/communit
y/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archiv
es/list/users(a)ovirt.org/message/4XKEEDT2HHVDQU7FZCANZ26UOMFJTBE5/
9:48 a.m.
New subject: Advice on deploying oVirt hyperconverged environment Node based
Thanks a lot.
Le dim. 8 juil. 2018 09:14, Maor Lipchuk <mlipchuk(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
cc'ing Denis and Sahina,
Perhaps they can share their expirience and insights with the hyperconverged
environment.
Regards,
Maor
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Tal Bar-Or <tbaror(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am about deploying a new Ovirt system for our developers that we plan
> to be hyperconverged environment Node based.
>
> The system workload would be mostly used for builders that compiling our
> code , which involves with lots of small files and intensive IO.
> I plan to build two glustered volume "layers" one based on sas drives for
> OS spin on, and second for Nvme based for intensive IO.
> I would expect that the system will be resilient/high availability and in
> the same time give enough good IO request for vm builders that will be at
> least 6 to 8 vm guests.
> The system hardware would be as follows:
> *chassis*: 4x HP DL380 gen8
> *each server hardware:*
> *cpu*: 2x e5-2690v2
> *memory*:256GB
> *Disks*:12x 1.2TB sas 10k disks , 2 mirror for os (or using usk
> kingstone 2x 128gb mirror) rest for vm os volume.
> *Nvme*: 2x960GB Kingstone KC1000 for builders compiling source code
> *Network: *4 ports Intel 10Gbit/s SFP +
>
> Given above configuration and theory, my question would be what would be
> best practice in terms of Gluster configuration *Distributed,Replicated,Distributed
> Replicated,Dispersed,Distributed Dispersed*?
> What is the suggestion for hardware raid type 5 or 6 , or use ZFS?
> Network nodes communication , i intend to use 3 ports for storage
> communication and one port for guests network , my question regarding
> Gluster inter communication , what is better would i gail from 3x 10G LACP
> or 1 network for each gluster volume?
>
> Please advice
> Thanks
>
> --
> Tal Bar-or
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4XKEEDT2HHV...
>
>
2:09 p.m.
New subject: Advice on deploying oVirt hyperconverged environment Node based
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Tal Bar-Or <tbaror(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,
I am about deploying a new Ovirt system for our developers that we plan to
be hyperconverged environment Node based.
The system workload would be mostly used for builders that compiling our
code , which involves with lots of small files and intensive IO.
I plan to build two glustered volume "layers" one based on sas drives for
OS spin on, and second for Nvme based for intensive IO.
I would expect that the system will be resilient/high availability and in
the same time give enough good IO request for vm builders that will be at
least 6 to 8 vm guests.
The system hardware would be as follows:
*chassis*: 4x HP DL380 gen8
*each server hardware:*
*cpu*: 2x e5-2690v2
*memory*:256GB
*Disks*:12x 1.2TB sas 10k disks , 2 mirror for os (or using usk kingstone
2x 128gb mirror) rest for vm os volume.
*Nvme*: 2x960GB Kingstone KC1000 for builders compiling source code
*Network: *4 ports Intel 10Gbit/s SFP +
Given above configuration and theory, my question would be what would be
best practice in terms of Gluster configuration *Distributed,Replicated,Distributed
Replicated,Dispersed,Distributed Dispersed*?
What is the suggestion for hardware raid type 5 or 6 , or use ZFS?
Replicated or distributed-replicated with replica 3 or replica 3 with
arbiter. Plain distribute will not provide HA for the data. Dispersed
volume types are not fully integrated and supported with oVirt
Network nodes communication , i intend to use 3 ports for storage
communication and one port for guests network , my question
regarding
Gluster inter communication , what is better would i gail from 3x 10G LACP
or 1 network for each gluster volume?
3x10G - since we do not really have a way to separate networks by each
gluster volume.
Please advice
Thanks
--
Tal Bar-or
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-
guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/
message/4XKEEDT2HHVDQU7FZCANZ26UOMFJTBE5/
2139
days inactive
2142
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Maor Lipchuk -
Sahina Bose -
Tal Bar-Or