On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote: > hi, > > i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h > nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable > to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems > which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live deploy of our > stuff. > > so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images and > rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work? > > cheers, > > juergen > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org... > > rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev versions are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or backported to rhev. I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together.

On 11/01/2013 02:36 AM, squadra wrote: > Hi Itamar, > > yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and > ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect > to break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the > lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd > management node, based on ovirt is also overkill. > > lets see if its killing my pets > this isn't only about same cluster compatibility, rather potentially trying to use a verb which doesn't exist in ovirt-3.2 and assumed by rhev 3.2. so YMMV, a lot. for *sure* do not try to put them in same DC, or your rhev cluster/DC may suffer.

> cheers, > > > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com > <mailto:iheim@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote: > > hi, > > i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h > nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be > wishable > to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of > hostsystems > which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live > deploy of our > stuff. > > so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images > and > rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work? > > cheers, > > juergen > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > ______________________________**___________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> > http://lists.ovirt.org/__**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.o... > > <http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org... > > > > > rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev > versions are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or > backported to rhev. > I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together. > > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org... > >