On Tue=2C Oct 20=2C 2015 at 4:51 AM=2C Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.c= om> wrote:=0A= =0A=
On Mon=2C Oct 19=2C 2015 at 09:16:06PM +0200=2C Johan Kooijman wrote:= =0A=
Never seen an update to this ticket. Are there any plans?=0A= =0A= On Tue=2C Jun 24=2C 2014 at 3:35 PM=2C Sven Kieske <S.Kieske at mittw= ald.de>=0A= wrote:=0A= =0A=
=0A= =0A= Am 24.06.2014 15:13=2C schrieb Nathana=EBl Blanchet:=0A=
Hi all=2C=0A= =0A= now rhel7 is out=2C it will become a part of the ovirt project in= a=0A= near=0A= future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM= =0A= virtualization part=2C is LXC planned to be supported for linux = VM by=0A= ovirt=2C like openvz is with proxmox?=0A= =0A= very good question=2C can't wait to read an answer!=0A= +1 from here.=0A= =0A= I'm not aware of current plans. We can consider this when ovirt-4.0=0A= feature request season opens.=0A= =0A= Until then=2C can you share your own use case for runnig LXC?=0A= =0A= =0A= It seems like Proxmox have quite the install base especially due to the= =0A= ability to mix containers and "fat" VMs. AFAIK that's the only feature th= ey=0A= have that is ahead of oVirt. And that install base should tell us this is= =0A= indeed a feature needed and widely used.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I'd love to see a vdsm hook that translates the qemu-kvm domxml into an= =0A= lxc one=2C as a first step. Anyone?=0A= =0A= =0A= That can be a fun project to do=2C but I'm not volunteering just yet =3B)= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Dan.=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= Users mailing list=0A= Users at ovirt.org=0A= http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users=0A= =0A= +1 A couple of related questions: *) what can we expect from the deprecation of libvirt LXC driver in RHEL? (= CentOS would follow suit=2C barring an extraordinary effort from the Virtua=
--_32f83bcc-43c9-436c-808b-5c521bcabddb_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable lization SIG=2C akin to the Xen-on-CentOS one) *) dreaming of a future convergence of oVirt-node and Atomic would be... we= ll=2C just dreaming? =3B) Giuseppe = --_32f83bcc-43c9-436c-808b-5c521bcabddb_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <style><!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px=3B padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 12pt=3B font-family:Calibri } --></style></head> <body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'><pre><span style=3D"white-space:= pre-wrap=3B">>=3B On Tue=2C Oct 20=2C 2015 at 4:51 AM=2C Dan Kenigsberg = <=3Bdanken at redhat.com>=3B wrote:=0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B >=3B On Mon=2C Oct 19=2C 2015 at 09:16:06PM +0200=2C Johan Kooijma= n wrote:=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B Never seen an update to this ticket. Are there any pl= ans?=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B On Tue=2C Jun 24=2C 2014 at 3:35 PM=2C Sven Kieske <= =3BS.Kieske at mittwald.de>=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B wrote:=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B Am 24.06.2014 15:13=2C schrieb Nathana=EBl Blan= chet:=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B Hi all=2C=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B now rhel7 is out=2C it will become a par= t of the ovirt project in a=0A= >=3B >=3B near=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B future. Given taht official LXC support = aims to complete the KVM=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B virtualization part=2C is LXC planned to= be supported for linux VM by=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B ovirt=2C like openvz is with proxmox?=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B very good question=2C can't wait to read an ans= wer!=0A= >=3B >=3B >=3B >=3B +1 from here.=0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B I'm not aware of current plans. We can consider this when ovi= rt-4.0=0A= >=3B >=3B feature request season opens.=0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B Until then=2C can you share your own use case for runnig LXC?= =0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B It seems like Proxmox have quite the install base especially due to = the=0A= >=3B ability to mix containers and "fat" VMs. AFAIK that's the only featu= re they=0A= >=3B have that is ahead of oVirt. And that install base should tell us th= is is=0A= >=3B indeed a feature needed and widely used.=0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B I'd love to see a vdsm hook that translates the qemu-kvm domx= ml into an=0A= >=3B >=3B lxc one=2C as a first step. Anyone?=0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B That can be a fun project to do=2C but I'm not volunteering just yet= =3B)=0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B =0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= >=3B >=3B Dan.=0A= >=3B >=3B _______________________________________________=0A= >=3B >=3B Users mailing list=0A= >=3B >=3B Users at ovirt.org=0A= >=3B >=3B http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users=0A= >=3B >=3B=0A= </span></pre><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>A couple of related questions= :</div><div><br></div><div>*) what can we expect from the deprecation of li= bvirt LXC driver in RHEL? (CentOS would follow suit=2C barring an extraordi= nary effort from the Virtualization SIG=2C akin to the Xen-on-CentOS one)</= div><div><br></div><div>*) dreaming of a future convergence of oVirt-node a= nd Atomic would be... well=2C just dreaming? =3B)</div><div><br></div><div>= Giuseppe</div><div><br></div> </div></body> </html>= --_32f83bcc-43c9-436c-808b-5c521bcabddb_--
participants (1)
-
Giuseppe Ragusa