yes, we should do both. Anyone want to take a first cut and then post to the board list so other can help edit it? Carl. On 11/11/2011 10:27 AM, Frank Novak wrote:

And maybe update the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OVirt

For the google_ page.. should we leverage the ova folks for stuff like that, or keep within ovirt.org?

Cheers, Frank

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Frank Novak ( 诺帆 nuò、fān ) STSM, SCEM Open Hypervisor IBM Linux Technology Center Internet: fnovak@us.ibm.com ; Notes: Frank Novak/Watson/IBM @IBMUS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: ryanh@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: cctrieloff@redhat.com Cc: project-planning@ovirt.org, board@ovirt.org Date: 11/11/2011 11:09 PM Subject: oVirt google+ page? Sent by: project-planning-bounces@ovirt.org

Should we make a google+ ovirt page?

http://www.google.com/+/business/

-- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx ryanh@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________ Project-planning mailing list Project-planning@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning

_______________________________________________ Board mailing list Board@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2011 10:02 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:

Generally speaking, it's better to have a neutral 3rd party edit your wikipedia page, or it can bite you.

How about: 1. One or a few of us add new content to the Talk:OVirt page. 2. The rest of us look, comment, and help fix. 3. We ask via the Talk: mechanism for other page maintainers to approve the changes. 4. If no one replies, we can put out the word generally that we've got some good content to change and would any editor of Wikipedia look it over. One challenge we have is, what is a neutral 3rd party? For example, if someone from Intel who doesn't work on oVirt made the changes, is that OK? Because I know a few editors who can help like that. :) - - Karsten - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFOvYXr2ZIOBq0ODEERAiJeAKCbJfCmSgqXafoULgfjpFm9+TCdwwCgvBpi ZTGn93G+F+6gKs3rgS8WTuU= =dXI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2011 12:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:

...

If you are on this mailing list, then you aren't a neutral third party ;-)

Heh, oh, well, I was thinking of people who aren't on this list.[1]

...

These things tend to take care of themselves. Give it a few months and I'm sure there will be a bigger page there. Consider it a metric of success for how well we get the word out :-)

OK, I'll try to share your optimism here. :) Now I'll have to do some thinking about that as a metric ... - - Karsten [1] Mainly curious I guess - if your company works on 100 upstream projects, does that mean no one from your company should edit the associated Wikipedia page? I.e. is there an institutional bias presumed, by association? - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFOvcfj2ZIOBq0ODEERAr8IAKCp4yaTHr7JHcmm+MidlvL2vPZ2twCeMjTk CKFJVLt0lRxc+gQNog0CBms= =0UWO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----