Jar versions in ovirt-engine

[Juan Hernandez]

On 04/18/2012 09:51 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
> Ever wondered why the version of oVirt's first release is 3.0.0_0001?
> The answer is simple - We use ovirt-engine jar's version as our "main" release version.
> 
> Personally, I think the current versioning scheme is ugly. Actually, I can't name even one open-source project using "_" in it's version.
> 
> What can we do about it? We have couple of options:
> 1. Leave the engine alone, and use a separate versioning scheme (e.g - use just 3.1.0 as the main version for next release)
> 2. Remove "_" from engine jars
> 3. Do nothing.
> 
> I'd like to hear your thoughts, as well as the reasons to use such an unusual versioning scheme.
> 
> ---
> Ofer Schreiber
> oVirt Release Manager
> _______________________________________________
> Arch mailing list
> Arch at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

>From my point of view using the 0001 suffix in the names of the jar
files is not a big problem, but I agree that using it in the release
number is ugly, and it produces issues/discussions during packaging. I
vote for option #1: use 3.1.0 for the next main version.

-- 
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.