[Engine-devel] Bridgeless Networks api design

[Michael Pasternak]

On 03/18/2012 10:39 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 10:43 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>> On 03/18/2012 10:21 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2012 09:33 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>>> the question is Management/Migration/Storage/Display can be non-bridged?, if so,
>>>> <bridged>true|false</bridged>   makes sense.
>>>
>>> bridge is an implementation detail at host level, hence the discussion is about abstracting it from users.
>>> a VM network doesn't have to have bridge at host level, for networks using VMFex or SR-IOV
>>
>> <network>
>>    <designation>Management|Migration|Storage|Display|VM</designation>
>> </network>
>>
>> what do you say about having it as another /designation/ type?
>>
> 
> it==VM?
> the above looks ok to me.
> (I really hope for a better element name than designation though)

I'd avoid using /type/ as type usually applies on single variant,
/assignment/ maybe? nothing batter comes to my mind

-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D