[Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated

Yair Zaslavsky yzaslavs at redhat.com
Thu May 10 14:29:23 UTC 2012


On 05/10/2012 05:16 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
>> To: "Miki Kenneth" <mkenneth at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen at redhat.com>, "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi at redhat.com>, "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow at redhat.com>,
>> "Simon Grinberg" <sgrinber at redhat.com>, "Eldan Hildesheim" <ehildesh at redhat.com>, "Eldan Hildesheim"
>> <info at eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub" <achub at redhat.com>, engine-devel at ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya" <hateya at redhat.com>,
>> "Ayal Baron" <abaron at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:14:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>>
>> On 05/10/2012 04:46 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
>>> we should had a mouseover tooltip for explaining what is PosixFS
>>> and mentioned that it is supported only in 3.1 cluster.
>>> Miki
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen at redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron"
>>>> <abaron at redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi at redhat.com>, "Andrew Cathrow"
>>>> <acathrow at redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth"
>>>> <mkenneth at redhat.com>, "Simon Grinberg" <sgrinber at redhat.com>,
>>>> "Eldan Hildesheim" <ehildesh at redhat.com>, "Eldan
>>>> Hildesheim" <info at eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub" <achub at redhat.com>,
>>>> engine-devel at ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya"
>>>> <hateya at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:28:31 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:21:42 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/10/2012 04:16 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
>>>>>> Please review the mock-ups on the feature page:
>>>>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Changes_in_GUI
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> From talking to Haim I understood that path should include ":"
>>>>
>>>> From talking to Ayal, the path can be similar in its format to a
>>>> path
>>>> provided when creating an NFS storage domain (e.g.
>>>> "server:/dir1/dir2"), *or* to a path provided when creating a
>>>> Local
>>>> storage domain (e.g. "/tmp/dir3"), meaning, without ":".
>>>> @Ayal - any chance for a clarification here?
>> This is important - it may yield a change to REST-API.
>> Ayal?
> 
> The validation should be not empty, after than anything goes.
Ori - this means we should model REST-API differently, and not as I
thought (current REST-API implementation will not be able to pass
mountSpec without ":" to backend).
I will summon a meeting on Sunday to close that ASAP
> 
>>
>>>>
>>>>> In addition - if we only support V1, why add the combo box?
>>>>
>>>> We are always showing the combo-box, even if we have only one
>>>> option
>>>> in it (so the user will know what is the value that is being
>>>> sent).
>>>> However, we disable it. I updated the mock-up to clarify this.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Einav
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>




More information about the Devel mailing list