[Engine-devel] operation mode
Laszlo Hornyak
lhornyak at redhat.com
Thu Nov 1 21:13:12 UTC 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak at redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:16:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] operation mode
>
> On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> > The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is
> > supported.
>
> I think this one is worth a bit more thinking before removing
> actually,
> but if you remove it in a single patch, easy enough to revert should
> we
> want to add something like this back (and the enum is far from all
> that
> needs to be done anyway for such a thing)
Do you plan to support hypervisors other than qemu+kvm?
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak at redhat.com>
> >> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM
> >> Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute,
> >> it
> >> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the
> >> attribute
> >> does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed
> >> or anyone need it?
> >>
> >> thx,
> >> Laszlo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Engine-devel mailing list
> >> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list