[Engine-devel] [vdsm] stale gerrit patches

[Ayal Baron]

----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron at redhat.com>
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> > <engine-devel at ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> > > > <engine-devel at ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > 
> > > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > > > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> > > > >> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> > > > >> <engine-devel at ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > > > >>>> To: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
> > > > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>,
> > > > >>>> vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
> > > > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days
> > > > >>>>>> (to
> > > > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower).
> > > > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their
> > > > >>>>>> closure.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get
> > > > >>>>>> attention,
> > > > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> thoughts?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>       Itamar
> > > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age
> > > > >>>>> of
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the
> > > > >>>>> maintainer,
> > > > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons
> > > > >>>>> it.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed
> > > > >>>> to
> > > > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something
> > > > >>>> like
> > > > >>>> that.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This will be annoying.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no
> > > > >> rebase,
> > > > >> nothing)?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+topic:independent_deployments,n,z
> > > > 
> > > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment
> > > > from any reviewer.
> > > > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let
> > > > them get old and stay forever
> > > 
> > > Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
> > > Owner can close these if he likes.
> > 
> > right, but why?
> > a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into
> > motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc).
> > I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
> > 
> 
> I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its
> contributers.

I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying.
Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.

> 
> > > 
> > > The problem is that maintainers avoid closing.
> > > And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and
> > > gone.
> > > 
> > > So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
> > > 
> > > 1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
> > > cycle
> > > (can be even a week).
> > > 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Alon
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > 
> > 
>