[Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor

[Liran Zelkha]

Why not move it to vds_static?


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
> - vds_dynamic
> - vds_on_boot
> We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the
> host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it.
> In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate
> all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.).
>
> thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Gilad.
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140403/cb9045e7/attachment-0001.html>