[Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor

[Liran Zelkha]

I would be happy if we can lose vds_dynamic all together, and just keep
vds_static and vds_statistics. Our performance will be happy too ;-)


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Eli Mesika <emesika at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik at redhat.com>
> > To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:00:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> > > To: "Liran Zelkha" <liran.zelkha at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik at redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> > > <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:12:59 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Liran Zelkha" <liran.zelkha at gmail.com>
> > > > To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik at redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:04:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> > > >
> > > > Why not move it to vds_static?
> > >
> > > +1 on Liran's comment.
>
> +1 as well , vds_static is the place for that
>
> > > I would prefer not to add more complexity to the  vds tables family.
> > > Such complexity may effect performs of queries/views.
> > > If you wish, you can create a view on top of vds_static named
> vds_on_boot
> > > for
> > > querying of vds on boot info.
> > >
> > > Yair
> >
> > That means moving almost all of vds_dynamic into vds_static except of
> memory,
> > pending resources and status (maybe more but not much);
> > and there will not be any db separation between user input and on_boot
> data.
>
> Why we should have such separation ?
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gilad.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik at redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi list,
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
> > > > > - vds_dynamic
> > > > > - vds_on_boot
> > > > > We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once
> the
> > > > > host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it.
> > > > > In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on
> > > > > migrate
> > > > > all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.).
> > > > >
> > > > > thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Gilad.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > > > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140403/9f891e5a/attachment-0001.html>