[ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils

Yair Zaslavsky yzaslavs at redhat.com
Fri Aug 22 00:39:31 UTC 2014



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> Cc: devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:25:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> 
> On 08/21/2014 09:55 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: "Moti Asayag" <masayag at redhat.com>, "Allon Mureinik"
> >> <amureini at redhat.com>, devel at ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:35:33 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> >>
> >> On 21/08/14 12:08, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> >>>> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag at redhat.com>
> >>>> Cc: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Allon Mureinik"
> >>>> <amureini at redhat.com>, devel at ovirt.org
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:26:40 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems like we can try moving to common-collections4. Yum on my
> >>>> Fedora20
> >>>> computer finds apache-commons-collections4 package. Fortunately somebody
> >>>> packed the jar into for a rpm for us. :-)
> >>> What about RHEL 6.5? Can you please run a quick check?
> >> Unfortunately my happiness was too hasty. Only Fedora people care to be
> >> in the forward of the technology... The RHEL ones do not care about
> >> that...
> >
> > This is what I remembered. When you responded to the email for the first
> > time , I had a strong deja vu that you tried addressing this issue
> > yourself in the past (commons-collectios4) - due to different reason.
> >
> 
> is there a specific conflict or problem (or a huge chain of dependencies) ?

To me it seems the answer to both is no -

This is the requirement list - 

java >= 1.5	
jpackage-utils	
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1	
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1	
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1	
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1	


Probably a matter of packaging?





> 
> 



More information about the Devel mailing list