[ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils

[Alon Bar-Lev]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Sheremeta" <gshereme at redhat.com>
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>, devel at ovirt.org, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 8:39:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> > To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > Cc: devel at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 8:39:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > > To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Yevgeny Zaspitsky"
> > > <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: devel at ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:25:52 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> > > 
> > > On 08/21/2014 09:55 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> > > >> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> > > >> Cc: "Moti Asayag" <masayag at redhat.com>, "Allon Mureinik"
> > > >> <amureini at redhat.com>, devel at ovirt.org
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:35:33 PM
> > > >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> > > >>
> > > >> On 21/08/14 12:08, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>>> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <yzaspits at redhat.com>
> > > >>>> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag at redhat.com>
> > > >>>> Cc: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Allon Mureinik"
> > > >>>> <amureini at redhat.com>, devel at ovirt.org
> > > >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:26:40 AM
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It seems like we can try moving to common-collections4. Yum on my
> > > >>>> Fedora20
> > > >>>> computer finds apache-commons-collections4 package. Fortunately
> > > >>>> somebody
> > > >>>> packed the jar into for a rpm for us. :-)
> > > >>> What about RHEL 6.5? Can you please run a quick check?
> > > >> Unfortunately my happiness was too hasty. Only Fedora people care to
> > > >> be
> > > >> in the forward of the technology... The RHEL ones do not care about
> > > >> that...
> > > >
> > > > This is what I remembered. When you responded to the email for the
> > > > first
> > > > time , I had a strong deja vu that you tried addressing this issue
> > > > yourself in the past (commons-collectios4) - due to different reason.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > is there a specific conflict or problem (or a huge chain of dependencies)
> > > ?
> > 
> > To me it seems the answer to both is no -
> > 
> > This is the requirement list -
> > 
> > java >= 1.5
> > jpackage-utils
> > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
> > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
> > 
> > 
> > Probably a matter of packaging?
> 
> IIRC, Alon was the one who replied, and the issue was that Jboss included an
> old version (and we don't have classpath isolation, I guess)
> 
> Greg
> 

We would like to avoid maintaining and package components that are not provider either by el6 or jboss distribution.

But based on other threads, it seems that I am the only one who remained trying to push compliance to the old ways, people feel that can maintain anything anywhere with no effort.

Regards,
Alon