[ovirt-devel] Creating a new gerrit flag

David Caro dcaroest at redhat.com
Tue Dec 9 17:02:44 UTC 2014


On 12/09, Oved Ourfali wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
> > To: "Oved Ourfali" <ovedo at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske at mittwald.de>, devel at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:40:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Creating a new gerrit flag
> > 
> > On 12/09, Oved Ourfali wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske at mittwald.de>
> > > > To: devel at ovirt.org
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:21:43 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Creating a new gerrit flag
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 09/12/14 13:47, Oved Ourfali wrote:
> > > > > safe up to 95% or so.
> > > > 
> > > > You just made up that number.
> > > > I don't really understand why you would want
> > > > to downgrade your code quality by circumventing tests.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe someone can elaborate on this a bit?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It doesn't downgrade the code quality.
> > > It is just a way to ensure developers can both merge changes, and do it as
> > > safely as possible without relying on post-submit tools.
> > > The number is indeed invented... as I don't have real statistics, but it
> > > comes to say that it would be safe most of the time.
> > > After the patch is merged, if CI will fail, it is the responsibility of the
> > > developer to check that out and fix that.
> > 
> > This thread was started to avoid getting to that point, as getting a
> > failed patch inside the code means breaking all the other tests that
> > run on top of it and that blocks all the development, not only that
> > specific patch.
> > 
> 
> The issue that started the discussion was an issue in which there was a Tests "-1" flag, and it was ignored.
> My suggestion will enforce that it won't be ignored.
> In more rare cases, in which the rebase is the source of the tests issue, then you'll find about it later.

I started the discussion, and I started it because a developer
complained about not being able to merge a patch because it was
failing the tests due to an already merged patch that was making all
the builds to fail. And was trying to get a solution to avoid getting
to that point where a patch is merged while breaking the tests.


So in summary, you are suggestion this:

Creating a new flag 'tested' with values +1, 0 and -1 that only jenkins
and managers can set

Block form submitting any patches that have a -1

Carry the value of that flag to following patches only if the flag was
-1

That way if any of the previous patches failed any test you won't be
able to merge it unless a maintainer accepts or the tests pass. But if
your previous patchset passed, you will be able to merge right away.

Is that correct?

Just for comparison, right now anyone with submit privileges can
submit any patch rebasing and submitting before jenkins gives it's
review. I don't see a real advantage, as right now only maintainers
should be able to submit, so the people doing the submit already know
that the tests are failing and ignoring it, your solution will not
prevent them from keep ignoring them.


> 
> 
> > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
> > > > 
> > > > Sven Kieske
> > > > 
> > > > Systemadministrator
> > > > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
> > > > Königsberger Straße 6
> > > > 32339 Espelkamp
> > > > T: +49-5772-293-100
> > > > F: +49-5772-293-333
> > > > https://www.mittwald.de
> > > > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
> > > > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad
> > > > Oeynhausen
> > > > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad
> > > > Oeynhausen
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devel mailing list
> > > > Devel at ovirt.org
> > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel at ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > 
> > --
> > David Caro
> > 
> > Red Hat S.L.
> > Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > 
> > Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> > Email: dcaro at redhat.com
> > Web: www.redhat.com
> > RHT Global #: 82-62605
> > 

-- 
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro at redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141209/a4838ecd/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Devel mailing list