[ovirt-devel] Heads-up: moving Libvirt xml creation to the engine
Roy Golan
rgolan at redhat.com
Wed Nov 23 20:26:33 UTC 2016
On 23 November 2016 at 19:27, Yaniv Dary <ydary at redhat.com> wrote:
> Does this mean we will be able to move the hooks to the engine side at
> some point? That would be much better than needing it on VDSM.
>
> Yaniv Dary
> Technical Product Manager
> Red Hat Israel Ltd.
> 34 Jerusalem Road
> Building A, 4th floor
> Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
>
> Tel : +972 (9) 7692306
> 8272306
> Email: ydary at redhat.com
> IRC : ydary
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Arik Hadas <ahadas at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Arik there is also custom metadata section for MOM and QoS in the
>> > libvirt domain XML and those values are now created as XML and later
>> > manipulated using libvirt API. VDSM will still need to know at least
>> > some basic stuff about the XML to be able to process it correctly (the
>> > metadata descriptor and the structure for example).
>>
>> Besides the parsing of the devices that we would love to get rid of, I
>> believe the parsing of Libvirt XML done by VDSM would remain as is.
>>
>> >
>> > Will the engine assume anything about the XML post-migration (for
>> > example to speed-up restarts for highly available VMs)? Because the
>> > hooks can change it significantly. Start hooks will be used anyway,
>> > but migration hook changes might not be reflected during the restart.
>> >
>>
>> Not sure that I fully understand.
>> You have a VM with configuration conf1 running on host1. While being
>> migrated to host2 the configuration is changed to conf2.
>> Do you suggest that the next time the VM restarts it would be created
>> based on conf2?
>>
>> Changes in the devices would be reflected on the next run (assuming the
>> engine got the updated devices) - as today.
>> Other than the devices, no configuration that is used on VM creation
>> (static data) is read back by the engine so if it is changed it won't be
>> reflected.
>> And at the moment we have no plan to change the content of the data that
>> is passed between the engine and VDSM, only its representation.
>>
>> Btw, I'm taking back my statement about migration:
>> "5. Not to re-generate the XML on each rerun attempt of VM run/migration."
>> VM migration flow is irrelevant since the engine doesn't pass the VM
>> configuration. It will remain as-is.
>>
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Arik Hadas <ahadas at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > We are working on something that is expected to have a big impact,
>> hence
>> > > this heads-up.
>> > > First, we want you to be aware of this change and provide your
>> feedback to
>> > > make it as good as possible.
>> > > Second, until the proposed mechanism is fully merged there will be a
>> chase
>> > > to cover all features unless new features are also implemented with
>> the
>> > > new mechanism. So please, if you are working on something that
>> > > adds/changes something in the Libvirt's domain xml, do it with this
>> new
>> > > mechanism as well (first version would be merged soon).
>> > >
>> > > * Goal
>> > > Creating Libvirt XML in the engine rather than in VDSM.
>> > > ** Today's flow
>> > > Engine: VM business entity -> VM properties map
>> > > VDSM: VM properties map -> Libvirt XML
>> > > ** Desired flow
>> > > Engine: VM business entity -> Libvirt XML
>> > >
>> > > * Potential Benefits
>> > > 1. Reduce the number of conversions from 2 to 1, reducing chances for
>> > > mistakes in the process.
>> > > 2. Reduce the amount of code in VDSM.
>> > > 3. Make VM related changes easier - today many of these changes need
>> to be
>> > > reviewed in 2 projects, this will eliminate the one that tends to take
>> > > longer.
>> > > 4. Prevent shortcuts in the form of VDSM-only changes that should be
>> better
>> > > reflected in the engine.
>> > > 5. Not to re-generate the XML on each rerun attempt of VM
>> run/migration.
>> > > 6. Future - not to re-generate the XML on each attempt to auto-start
>> HA VM
>> > > when using vm-leases (need to make sure we're using the up-to-date VM
>> > > configuration though).
>> > > 7. We already found improvements and cleanups that could be made while
>> > > touching this area (e.g., remove the boot order from devices in the
>> > > database).
>> > >
>> > > * Challenges
>> > > 1. Not to move host-specific information to the engine. For example,
>> path
>> > > to storage domain or sockets of channels.
>> > > The solution is to use place-holders that will be replaced by VDSM.
>> > > 2. Backward compatibility.
>> > > 3. The more challenging part is the other direction - that will be
>> the next
>> > > phase.
>> > >
>> > > * Status
>> > > As a first step, we began with producing the Libvirt XML in the
>> engine by
>> > > converting the VM properties map to XML in the engine [1]
>> > > And using the XML that is received as an input in VDSM [2]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/64473/
>> > > [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65182/
>> > >
>>
>
+1 This simplifies the process of implementing features. We always have to
encode the engine structures to vdsm and then
libvirt, and get it wrong... hate it.
- Do you know of limitations when passing data types? numbers floats dicts
. XML always hides a surprise with data types.
- I saw you used xml writer. Please look into JAXB.
- If the schema is well maintained, another JAXB advantage would be that
the XML we will emit will always be valid.
> > Regards,
>> > > Arik
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Devel mailing list
>> > > Devel at ovirt.org
>> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161123/9c023080/attachment.html>
More information about the Devel
mailing list