[ovirt-devel] Failure on start VM in ovirt-system-tests from patches merged to master on the 25/10/2016
Yaniv Kaul
ykaul at redhat.com
Sat Oct 29 16:24:01 UTC 2016
IDK - still fails for me, though on potentiall different issue:
Cluster creation fails with:
RequestError:
status: 400
reason: Bad Request
detail: Cannot create Cluster. The chosen CPU is not supported.
The chosen CPU is the same CPU I've used for several weeks now...
Engine.log shows:
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.generic.DBConfigUtils] (ServerService
Thread Pool -- 54) [] Didn't find the value of 'ServerCPUList' in DB for
version '4.1' - using default: '1:
pentium3:vmx:pentium3;2:intel-qemu64-nx:vmx,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2;3:intel-qemu64:vmx,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2;2:amd-qemu64-nx:svm,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2;3:amd-qemu64:svm,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2'
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU '1:pentium3:vmx:pentium3', not in
expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'2:intel-qemu64-nx:vmx,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2', not in expected for
mat.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'3:intel-qemu64:vmx,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2', not in expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'2:amd-qemu64-nx:svm,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2', not in expected forma
t.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,952 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'3:amd-qemu64:svm,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2', not in expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.generic.DBConfigUtils] (ServerService
Thread Pool -- 54) [] Didn't find the value of 'ServerCPUList' in DB for
version '4.0' - using default: '1:
pentium3:vmx:pentium3;2:intel-qemu64-nx:vmx,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2;3:intel-qemu64:vmx,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2;2:amd-qemu64-nx:svm,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2;3:amd-qemu64:svm,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2'
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU '1:pentium3:vmx:pentium3', not in
expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'2:intel-qemu64-nx:vmx,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2', not in expected for
mat.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'3:intel-qemu64:vmx,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2', not in expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'2:amd-qemu64-nx:svm,sse2:qemu64,-nx,+sse2', not in expected forma
t.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,953 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Error getting info for CPU
'3:amd-qemu64:svm,sse2,nx:qemu64,+sse2', not in expected format.
2016-10-29 12:18:50,954 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CpuFlagsManagerHandler] (ServerService Thread
Pool -- 54) [] Finished initializing dictionaries
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
wrote:
> And now the CI job is [finally] passing.
> Piotr/Eli - the stomp timeout may be worth investigating, but it's
> definitely NOT the root cause of the previous failures, so feel free to
> deprioritize it as you see fit.
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped debug/investigate/review these issues, and
> sorry for the noise.
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The 004 CI is now passing, and it fails on 006.
>> I merged a patch for the failure, let's see where we get next.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Now I also see it in the CI.
>>>
>>> I merged the patch so we can squeeze in as many CI runs as possible
>>> before the weekend.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [Adding Martin Sivak.]
>>>>
>>>> That reproduces on my setup too, but didn't see it in CI, and is not
>>>> related to the recent injection issues.
>>>>
>>>> Martin - This issue seems to have been introduced in your patch 0e4ae6b.
>>>> I'm not sure eaxctly why java doesn't like the @NotNull annotation on
>>>> schedule, but ampyrically it does, as removing it solves the issue.
>>>> I've posted https://gerrit.ovirt.org/65784 to do so - please review
>>>> (or suggest a better solution, of course :-))
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Allon
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I still fail to run a VM:
>>>>> 2016-10-27 02:01:02,849 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand]
>>>>> (default task-17) [78897d21] Command 'org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand'
>>>>> failed: HV000186: The constraint of type 'javax.valida
>>>>> tion.constraints.NotNull' defined on 'schedule.<return value>' has
>>>>> multiple matching constraint validators which is due to an additional value
>>>>> handler of type 'org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.valuehandli
>>>>> ng.OptionalValueUnwrapper'. It is unclear which value needs
>>>>> validating. Clarify configuration via @UnwrapValidatedValue.
>>>>> 2016-10-27 02:01:02,849 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand]
>>>>> (default task-17) [78897d21] Exception: javax.validation.UnexpectedTypeException:
>>>>> HV000186: The constraint of type 'javax.validation.con
>>>>> straints.NotNull' defined on 'schedule.<return value>' has multiple
>>>>> matching constraint validators which is due to an additional value handler
>>>>> of type 'org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.valuehandling.Optio
>>>>> nalValueUnwrapper'. It is unclear which value needs validating.
>>>>> Clarify configuration via @UnwrapValidatedValue.
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.getConstraintV
>>>>> alidatorInstanceForAutomaticUnwrapping(ConstraintTree.java:266)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Fin
>>>>> al]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.getInitialized
>>>>> ConstraintValidator(ConstraintTree.java:163)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.validateConstraints(ConstraintTree.java:116)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.validateConstraints(ConstraintTree.java:87)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.metadata.core.MetaConstraint.validateConstraint(MetaConstraint.java:73)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateConstraintsForGroup(ValidatorImpl.java:1488)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateReturnValueForSingleGroup(ValidatorImpl.java:1459)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateReturnValueForGroup(ValidatorImpl.java:1422)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateReturnValueInContext(ValidatorImpl.java:1338)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateReturnValue(ValidatorImpl.java:317)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateReturnValue(ValidatorImpl.java:277)
>>>>> [hibernate-validator-5.2.4.Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>> Method) [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccess
>>>>> orImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAc
>>>>> cessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>> [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>> [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.Abst
>>>>> ractBeanInstance.invoke(AbstractBeanInstance.java:38)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.Prox
>>>>> yMethodHandler.invoke(ProxyMethodHandler.java:100)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weldx.validation.Exe
>>>>> cutableValidator$Validator$976505265$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.validateReturnValue(Unknown
>>>>> Source)
>>>>> at org.hibernate.validator.intern
>>>>> al.cdi.interceptor.ValidationInterceptor.validateMethodInvoc
>>>>> ation(ValidationInterceptor.java:80) [hibernate-validator-cdi-5.2.4
>>>>> .Final.jar:5.2.4.Final]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>> Method) [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccess
>>>>> orImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAc
>>>>> cessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>> [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>> [rt.jar:1.8.0_111]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.rea
>>>>> der.SimpleInterceptorInvocation$SimpleMethodInvocation.invok
>>>>> e(SimpleInterceptorInvocation.java:74) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.ja
>>>>> r:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.pro
>>>>> xy.InterceptorMethodHandler.executeAroundInvoke(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:84)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.pro
>>>>> xy.InterceptorMethodHandler.executeInterception(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:72)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.pro
>>>>> xy.InterceptorMethodHandler.invoke(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:56)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.Comb
>>>>> inedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.invoke(Combine
>>>>> dInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.java:79)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.Comb
>>>>> inedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.invoke(Combine
>>>>> dInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.java:68)
>>>>> [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.sche
>>>>> duling.SchedulingManager$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass.schedule(Unknown
>>>>> Source) [bll.jar:]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunV
>>>>> mCommand.getVdsToRunOn(RunVmCommand.java:818) [bll.jar:]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunV
>>>>> mCommand.runVm(RunVmCommand.java:231) [bll.jar:]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunV
>>>>> mCommand.perform(RunVmCommand.java:414) [bll.jar:]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunV
>>>>> mCommand.executeVmCommand(RunVmCommand.java:339) [bll.jar:]
>>>>> at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.VmCo
>>>>> mmand.executeCommand(VmCommand.java:106) [bll.jar:]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like we cleared up the engine issues related to the recent
>>>>>> injection changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am now seeing stop errors, e.g.:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "ea0c564f-bc17-4fc2-8f1b-67c4d28257c6", "result": {"cpuStatistics": {"1": {"cpuUser": "3.07", "nodeIndex": 0, "cpuSys": "3.00", "cpuIdle": "93.93"}, "0": {"cpuUser": "1.67", "nodeIndex": 0, "cpuSys": "2.07", "cpuIdle": "96.26"}}, "numaNodeMemFree": {"0": {"memPercent": 83, "memFree": "359"}}, "memShared": 0, "thpState": "always", "ksmMergeAcrossNodes": true, "vmCount": 0, "memUsed": "20", "storageDomains": {"b2bb3220-1eb3-426a-90c2-5e236aefbe1a": {"code": 0, "actual": true, "version": 0, "acquired": true, "delay": "0.000840117", "lastCheck": "7.1", "valid": true}, "3130195a-73f9-4490-b554-98a9205cead6": {"code": 0, "actual": true, "version": 4, "acquired": true, "delay": "0.00150771", "lastCheck": "7.5", "valid": true}, "1a9e202b-83b7-4bdc-9b0c-e76b83676068": {"code": 0, "actual": true, "version": 4, "acquired": true, "delay": "0.000590956",
>>>>>> 2016-10-26 21:51:09,878 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.FixedDelayJobListener] (DefaultQuartzScheduler7) [6d206bd1] Rescheduling DEFAULT.org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.tasks.CommandCallbacksPoller.invokeCallbackMethods#-9223372036854775783 as there is no unfired trigger.
>>>>>> 2016-10-26 21:51:28,705 DEBUG [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.ReactorClient] (SSL Stomp Reactor) [383dd6a0] Heartbeat exceeded. Closing channel
>>>>>> 2016-10-26 21:51:28,708 DEBUG [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.Reactor] (SSL Stomp Reactor) [383dd6a0] Internal server error: null: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.SSLClient.write(SSLClient.java:102) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.ReactorClient.processOutgoing(ReactorClient.java:245) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.ReactorClient.process(ReactorClient.java:208) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.SSLClient.process(SSLClient.java:125) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.Reactor.processChannels(Reactor.java:89) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>> at org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.Reactor.run(Reactor.java:65) [vdsm-jsonrpc-java-client.jar:]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr - any idea?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Nadav Goldin <ngoldin at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Its running now:
>>>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_build-artif
>>>>>>> acts-fc24-x86_64/1037/,
>>>>>>> when it finishes it will trigger the deploy job which will trigger
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> experimental job. The build_artifacts job is triggered approximately
>>>>>>> every 2 hours(depends on the load).
>>>>>>> Inside the build-artifacts job you can see the last
>>>>>>> commit(https://gerrit.ovirt.org/65776, which is already after your
>>>>>>> commit)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > @Infra - the last experimental job I saw was from ~17:30 local
>>>>>>> Israel time.
>>>>>>> > Any idea why another one isn't being triggered (or am I just being
>>>>>>> daft)?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Allon Mureinik <
>>>>>>> amureini at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Yipes.
>>>>>>> >> [1] should fix that, waiting for the CI to run to merge.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65768/
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Nadav Goldin <ngoldin at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Unfortunately it is still failing, see[1], the repository used
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> >>> built from commit [2]. If you want to check the logs same links
>>>>>>> >>> apply(just replace build number 2759->2782)
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> [1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_ma
>>>>>>> ster/2782
>>>>>>> >>> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65740/
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> > Should be fixed now on master as those patches were just
>>>>>>> merged:
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65738/ - "Move InjectorRule to
>>>>>>> VdsBroker":
>>>>>>> >>> > aligns the InjectorRule's package with the Injector so it can
>>>>>>> >>> > essentially be
>>>>>>> >>> > used wherever the Injector is used [+12, -4]
>>>>>>> >>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65739 - "InjectorRule: override
>>>>>>> injector
>>>>>>> >>> > anyway": Fixes a bug in InjectorRule where the Injector is
>>>>>>> only mocked
>>>>>>> >>> > if
>>>>>>> >>> > you call InjectorRule.bind [+6, -1]
>>>>>>> >>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65740 - "core: InjectorRule for
>>>>>>> injecting
>>>>>>> >>> > members": Fixes a bug in InjectorRule to allow using
>>>>>>> >>> > Injector.injectMembers
>>>>>>> >>> > when using it [+18, -5]
>>>>>>> >>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65725 - "core: Fix
>>>>>>> AuditLogging": The
>>>>>>> >>> > actual
>>>>>>> >>> > fix. Basically, goes over all the places that create an
>>>>>>> >>> > AuditLoggableBase
>>>>>>> >>> > that needs injecting and take care of it [+155, -160]
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Nadav Goldin <
>>>>>>> ngoldin at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> >>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> Hi,
>>>>>>> >>> >> We have new failure on OST from patches merged to master
>>>>>>> yesterday,
>>>>>>> >>> >> the failure started after the merge of [1], but as there were
>>>>>>> quite a
>>>>>>> >>> >> few patches merged quickly I can't make sure it is the one
>>>>>>> causing
>>>>>>> >>> >> it(OST aren't ran per-patch).
>>>>>>> >>> >> The test that fails is [2] when attempting to start the VM.
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> The error from the API side:
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> RequestError:
>>>>>>> >>> >> status: 500
>>>>>>> >>> >> reason: Internal Server Error
>>>>>>> >>> >> detail: javax.ejb.EJBException: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInNoTx(
>>>>>>> CMTTxInterceptor.java:213)
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInNoTx(CMTTxInte
>>>>>>> rceptor.java:265)
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.supports(CMTTxIntercep
>>>>>>> tor.java:374)
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTT
>>>>>>> xInterceptor.java:243)
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorC
>>>>>>> ontext.java:340)
>>>>>>> >>> >> ....
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> In the engine logs there are a few
>>>>>>> 'java.lang.NullPointerException'
>>>>>>> >>> >> errors:
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> 2016-10-25 11:53:52,845 INFO
>>>>>>> >>> >> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLo
>>>>>>> gableBase]
>>>>>>> >>> >> (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-2) [5e6a88be] Failed to get
>>>>>>> vds
>>>>>>> >>> >> 'd60db21f-95f0-487b-9f17-44861e2610a7', error: null
>>>>>>> >>> >> 2016-10-25 11:53:52,864 DEBUG
>>>>>>> >>> >> [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.FixedDelayJobListener]
>>>>>>> >>> >> (DefaultQuartzScheduler5) [] Rescheduling
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> DEFAULT.org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.tasks.AsyncTaskManager.tim
>>>>>>> erElapsed#-9223372036854775787
>>>>>>> >>> >> as there is no unfired trigger.
>>>>>>> >>> >> ...
>>>>>>> >>> >> 2016-10-25 11:53:52,845 DEBUG
>>>>>>> >>> >> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLo
>>>>>>> gableBase]
>>>>>>> >>> >> (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-2) [5e6a88be] Exception:
>>>>>>> >>> >> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLog
>>>>>>> ableBase.getVdsStatic(AuditLogableBase.java:633)
>>>>>>> >>> >> [dal.jar:]
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLog
>>>>>>> ableBase.getVdsName(AuditLogableBase.java:504)
>>>>>>> >>> >> [dal.jar:]
>>>>>>> >>> >> ...
>>>>>>> >>> >> 2016-10-25 11:53:52,837 INFO
>>>>>>> >>> >> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLo
>>>>>>> gableBase]
>>>>>>> >>> >> (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-2) [5e6a88be] Failed to get
>>>>>>> vds
>>>>>>> >>> >> 'd60db21f-95f0-487b-9f17-44861e2610a7', error: null
>>>>>>> >>> >> 2016-10-25 11:53:52,837 DEBUG
>>>>>>> >>> >> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLo
>>>>>>> gableBase]
>>>>>>> >>> >> (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-2) [5e6a88be] Exception:
>>>>>>> >>> >> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLog
>>>>>>> ableBase.getVdsStatic(AuditLogableBase.java:633)
>>>>>>> >>> >> [dal.jar:]
>>>>>>> >>> >> at
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLog
>>>>>>> ableBase.getVdsName(AuditLogableBase.java:504)
>>>>>>> >>> >> [dal.jar:]
>>>>>>> >>> >> ...
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> The full engine logs can be found here[3] and the entire test
>>>>>>> suite
>>>>>>> >>> >> logs here[4].
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> Can anyone have a look?
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>> >> Nadav.
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65198/
>>>>>>> >>> >> [2]
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-system-tests/blob/master/basi
>>>>>>> c_suite_master/test-scenarios/004_basic_sanity.py#L322
>>>>>>> >>> >> [3]
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_ma
>>>>>>> ster/2759/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic_suite_master.sh-
>>>>>>> fc24/exported-artifacts/test_logs/basic_suite_master/post-00
>>>>>>> 4_basic_sanity.py/*zip*/post-004_basic_sanity.py.zip
>>>>>>> >>> >> [4]
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_ma
>>>>>>> ster/2759/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic_suite_master.sh-
>>>>>>> fc24/exported-artifacts/
>>>>>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>> >> Devel mailing list
>>>>>>> >>> >> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>>>>> >>> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161029/2173d507/attachment.html>
More information about the Devel
mailing list