oVirt google+ page?

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/11/2011 10:02 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
> Generally speaking, it's better to have a neutral 3rd party edit
> your wikipedia page, or it can bite you.

How about:

1. One or a few of us add new content to the Talk:OVirt page.
2. The rest of us look, comment, and help fix.
3. We ask via the Talk: mechanism for other page maintainers to
approve the changes.
4. If no one replies, we can put out the word generally that we've got
some good content to change and would any editor of Wikipedia look it
over.

One challenge we have is, what is a neutral 3rd party? For example, if
someone from Intel who doesn't work on oVirt made the changes, is that
OK? Because I know a few editors who can help like that. :)

- - Karsten
- -- 
name:  Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect
team:    Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
uri:              http://communityleadershipteam.org
                         http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
gpg:                                        AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFOvYXr2ZIOBq0ODEERAiJeAKCbJfCmSgqXafoULgfjpFm9+TCdwwCgvBpi
ZTGn93G+F+6gKs3rgS8WTuU=
=dXI3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----