dealing with a larger capacity workshop

[Anthony Liguori]

On 10/07/2011 01:23 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 09:28:17AM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>
>> no, we need to cap around 80. If we get too large the sessions will
>> become lectures and non-productive for
>> the kick-off workshop.
>
> OK, I see, so your vision of size extends in to the break-out sessions
> as dividing up one reasonably-sized-pool. Makes sense to me.
>
> So we're effectively at 80 people on the RSVP list, with just a few of
> those placeholders to be filled. (I'm in communication with
> placeholder owners, no worries.)
>
> Here's a quick plan, does this work?
>
> 1. At 80 to 85 we draw the line - we can support 85 on the first day
>     in a safe and legal way.
>
> 2. Fix website content to say we're full but RSVP if you want to be on
>     a wait list.
>
> 3. We do a quick post on Twitter etc. that we're full. Some of us
>     write in our blogs that this happened, good sign of interest, sorry
>     for those who are missing it, more to come.
>
> 4. Have some simple, "How to stay involved" information for folks who
>     show interest. For example, I'm going to start a monthly oVirt
>     Bay Area Meetup targeted for mid-December.

For working sessions, would it be possible to stream audio either via a 
conference call or through an audio streaming service?

At UDSes, they tend to project an IRC session and use group note taking software 
in order to let people remotely participate.  Perhaps Dustin knows some more of 
the specifics on the technologies used.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> - Karsten
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Project-planning mailing list
> Project-planning at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning