dealing with a larger capacity workshop

[Ayal Baron]

----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 09:28:17AM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> > 
> > no, we need to cap around 80. If we get too large the sessions will
> > become lectures and non-productive for
> > the kick-off workshop.
> 
> OK, I see, so your vision of size extends in to the break-out
> sessions
> as dividing up one reasonably-sized-pool. Makes sense to me.
> 
> So we're effectively at 80 people on the RSVP list, with just a few
> of
> those placeholders to be filled. (I'm in communication with
> placeholder owners, no worries.)

Do we have any estimate on how many of the rsvps won't show up in the end?

> 
> Here's a quick plan, does this work?
> 
> 1. At 80 to 85 we draw the line - we can support 85 on the first day
>    in a safe and legal way.
> 
> 2. Fix website content to say we're full but RSVP if you want to be
> on
>    a wait list.
> 
> 3. We do a quick post on Twitter etc. that we're full. Some of us
>    write in our blogs that this happened, good sign of interest,
>    sorry
>    for those who are missing it, more to come.
> 
> 4. Have some simple, "How to stay involved" information for folks who
>    show interest. For example, I'm going to start a monthly oVirt
>    Bay Area Meetup targeted for mid-December.
> 
> - Karsten
> --
> name:  Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
> team:   Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
> uri:             http://communityleadershipteam.org
>                         http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
> gpg:                                       AD0E0C41
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Project-planning mailing list
> Project-planning at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning
>