oVirt comminuty voting
Carl Trieloff
cctrieloff at redhat.com
Fri Sep 9 20:59:10 UTC 2011
On 09/09/2011 04:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Okay, that sounds good. Perhaps we should try to work language like
> this into more of these docs? Basically, three tiers of projects:
>
> Tier 0; x < 3 maintainers, oVirt board has ability to make decisions
> on behalf of the project.
>
> Tier 1; 3 <= x < 10 maintainers, project is autonomous, but must use
> oVirt recommended voting procedures and maintainership model.
>
> Tier 2; x >= 10 maintainers, project is autonomous and writes its own
> governance document. Perhaps the document should be voted on by the
> oVirt board?
>
> I think that creates a nice incubator model where oVirt helps a
> project grow and gets out of the way once it reaches critical mass.
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of where the initial set of seed projects
> will fit? How many maintainers is oVirt Server likely to have? (I
> assume that's the biggest of the seed projects).
That looks nice, I cut and paste this into the doc I working now --
called - becoming an oVirt sub-project
Carl.
More information about the Project-planning
mailing list