[Users] Strange UI bug: tab "VM" unusable / oVirt 3.3.1+

Tomas Jelinek tjelinek at redhat.com
Mon Dec 9 15:20:00 UTC 2013



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Wall" <fw at moov.de>
> To: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek at redhat.com>
> Cc: "oVirt Users" <users at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 3:56:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Strange UI bug: tab "VM" unusable / oVirt 3.3.1+
> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> On 2013-12-09 14:22, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
> > 2: spiceSupportMatrix.get(osId) returned null. [...]
> > I would guess this is the issue. To verify this could you please paste
> > here the content of all .../osinfo.conf.d/*.properties and also the
> > result of
> > "select os, vm_name from vm_static" DB query so we can find which
> > value is not there.
> 
> you're right. I did a lookup in the database and compared the values
> to the entries in /etc/ovirt-engine/osinfo.conf.d/*.properties.
> I noticed that the "os" ID 6 is assigned multiple times, but not
> defined in a .properties file (anymore).
> 
> A quick check in the Admin Portal confirms this:
> open "Edit Virtual Machine" => Operating System: null
> 
> I can't remember what "os" ID 6 was in previous releases. Anyway,
> since I used this to classify my FreeBSD VMs, I've setup a new
> file defining it:
> 
> # cat /etc/ovirt-engine/osinfo.conf.d/freebsd.properties
> # FreeBSD(6, OsType.BSD, false),
> os.freebsd.id.value = 6
> os.freebsd.name.value = FreeBSD
> os.freebsd.derivedFrom.value = other
> os.freebsd.description.value = FreeBSD Operating System
> os.freebsd.family.value = BSD
> 
> This fixed my issue, but I still would like to know why ID 6
> was silently removed in 3.3.1 :-) Maybe it should be re-added
> in 3.3.2 to avoid this UI breakage for other people.

Awesome!

So I had a look into the history of the osinfo-defaults.properties and the "6" used to be "Other":
# Other(6, OsType.Other, false)
os.Other.id.value = 6
os.Other.name.value = Other
os.Other.derivedFrom.value = Unassigned 

and it disappeared in this patch:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/16679/11

@Roy:
Any reason this has been removed?

> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> - Frank
> 



More information about the Users mailing list