[ovirt-users] ovirt 3.6.6 and gluster 3.7.13
Scott
romracer at gmail.com
Sat Aug 13 09:19:57 EDT 2016
Had a chance to upgrade my cluster to Gluster 3.7.14 and can confirm it
works for me too where 3.7.12/13 did not.
I did find that you should NOT turn off network.remote-dio or turn
on performance.strict-o-direct as suggested earlier in the thread. They
will prevent dd (using direct flag) and other things from working
properly. I'd leave those at network.remote-dio=enabled
and performance.strict-o-direct=off.
Hopefully we can see Gluster 3.7.14 moved out of testing repo soon.
Scott
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:05 AM, David Gossage <dgossage at carouselchecks.com>
wrote:
> So far gluster 3.7.14 seems to have resolved issues at least on my test
> box. dd commands that failed previously now work with sharding on zfs
> backend,
>
> Where before I couldn't even mount a new storage domain it now mounted and
> I have a test vm being created.
>
> Still have to let VM run for a few days and make sure no locking freezing
> occurs but looks hopeful so far.
>
> *David Gossage*
> *Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator*
> *Office* 708.613.2284
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:15 AM, David Gossage <
> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 1. Could you please attach the glustershd logs from all three nodes?
>>>
>>
>> Here are ccgl1 and ccgl2. as previously mentioned ccgl3 third node was
>> down from bad nic so no relevant logs would be on that node.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2. Also, so far what we know is that the 'Operation not permitted'
>>> errors are on the main vm image itself and not its individual shards (ex
>>> deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d). Could you do the following:
>>> Get the inode number of .glusterfs/de/b6/deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>>> (ls -li) from the first brick. I'll call this number INODE_NUMBER.
>>> Execute `find . -inum INODE_NUMBER` from the brick root on first brick
>>> to print the hard links against the file in the prev step and share the
>>> output.
>>>
>> [dgossage at ccgl1 ~]$ sudo ls -li /gluster1/BRICK1/1/.glusterfs/
>> de/b6/deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>> 16407 -rw-r--r--. 2 36 36 466 Jun 5 16:52 /gluster1/BRICK1/1/.glusterfs/
>> de/b6/deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>> [dgossage at ccgl1 ~]$ cd /gluster1/BRICK1/1/
>> [dgossage at ccgl1 1]$ sudo find . -inum 16407
>> ./7c73a8dd-a72e-4556-ac88-7f6813131e64/dom_md/metadata
>> ./.glusterfs/de/b6/deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 3. Did you delete any vms at any point before or after the upgrade?
>>>
>>
>> Immediately before or after on same day pretty sure I deleted nothing.
>> During week prior I deleted a few dev vm's that were never setup and some
>> the week after upgrade as I was preparing for moving disks off and on
>> storage to get them sharded and felt it would be easier to just recreate
>> some disks that had no data yet rather than move them off and on later.
>>
>>>
>>> -Krutika
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Gossage <
>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, could you try the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> i. Set network.remote-dio to off
>>>>> # gluster volume set <VOL> network.remote-dio off
>>>>>
>>>>> ii. Set performance.strict-o-direct to on
>>>>> # gluster volume set <VOL> performance.strict-o-direct on
>>>>>
>>>>> iii. Stop the affected vm(s) and start again
>>>>>
>>>>> and tell me if you notice any improvement?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Previous instll I had issue with is still on gluster 3.7.11
>>>>
>>>> My test install of ovirt 3.6.7 and gluster 3.7.13 with 3 bricks on a
>>>> locak disk right now isn't allowing me to add the gluster storage at all.
>>>>
>>>> Keep getting some type of UI error
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-25 12:49:09,277 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.ui.frontend.server.gwt.OvirtRemoteLoggingService]
>>>> (default task-33) [] Permutation name: 430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785
>>>> 2016-07-25 12:49:09,277 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.ui.frontend.server.gwt.OvirtRemoteLoggingService]
>>>> (default task-33) [] Uncaught exception: : java.lang.ClassCastException
>>>> at Unknown.ps(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 3837)
>>>> at Unknown.ts(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 20)
>>>> at Unknown.vs(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 18)
>>>> at Unknown.iJf(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 19) at
>>>> Unknown.Xab(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 48) at
>>>> Unknown.P8o(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 4447) at
>>>> Unknown.jQr(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 21) at
>>>> Unknown.A8o(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 51) at
>>>> Unknown.u8o(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 101) at
>>>> Unknown.Eap(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 10718) at
>>>> Unknown.p8n(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 161) at
>>>> Unknown.Cao(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 31) at
>>>> Unknown.Bap(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 10469) at
>>>> Unknown.kRn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 49) at
>>>> Unknown.nRn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 438) at
>>>> Unknown.eVn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 40) at
>>>> Unknown.hVn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 25827) at
>>>> Unknown.MTn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 25) at
>>>> Unknown.PTn(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 24052) at
>>>> Unknown.KJe(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 21125) at
>>>> Unknown.Izk(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 10384) at
>>>> Unknown.P3(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 137)
>>>> at Unknown.g4(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-
>>>> engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 8271)
>>>> at Unknown.<anonymous>(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.
>>>> local/ovirt-engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA7
>>>> 85.cache.html at 65) at Unknown._t(https://ccengine2.
>>>> carouselchecks.local/ovirt-engine/webadmin/
>>>> 430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 29) at Unknown.du(
>>>> https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.local/ovirt-engine/webadmin/
>>>> 430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA785.cache.html at 57) at
>>>> Unknown.<anonymous>(https://ccengine2.carouselchecks.
>>>> local/ovirt-engine/webadmin/430985F23DFC1C8BE1C7FDD91EDAA7
>>>> 85.cache.html at 54)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Krutika
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Samuli Heinonen <
>>>>> samppah at neutraali.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On 25 Jul 2016, at 12:34, David Gossage <
>>>>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <
>>>>>> kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks for the logs. So I have identified one issue from the logs
>>>>>> for which the fix is this: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14669/.
>>>>>> Because of a bug in the code, ENOENT was getting converted to EPERM and
>>>>>> being propagated up the stack causing the reads to bail out early with
>>>>>> 'Operation not permitted' errors.
>>>>>> > I still need to find out two things:
>>>>>> > i) why there was a readv() sent on a non-existent (ENOENT) file
>>>>>> (this is important since some of the other users have not faced or reported
>>>>>> this issue on gluster-users with 3.7.13)
>>>>>> > ii) need to see if there's a way to work around this issue.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Do you mind sharing the steps needed to be executed to run into
>>>>>> this issue? This is so that we can apply our patches, test and ensure they
>>>>>> fix the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately I can’t test this right away nor give exact steps how
>>>>>> to test this. This is just a theory but please correct me if you see some
>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> oVirt uses cache=none settings for VM’s by default which requires
>>>>>> direct I/O. oVirt also uses dd with iflag=direct to check that storage has
>>>>>> direct I/O enabled. Problems exist with GlusterFS with sharding enabled and
>>>>>> bricks running on ZFS on Linux. Everything seems to be fine with GlusterFS
>>>>>> 3.7.11 and problems exist at least with version .12 and .13. There has been
>>>>>> some posts saying that GlusterFS 3.8.x is also affected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>>>> 1. Sharded file is created with GlusterFS 3.7.11. Everything works ok.
>>>>>> 2. GlusterFS is upgraded to 3.7.12+
>>>>>> 3. Sharded file cannot be read or written with direct I/O enabled.
>>>>>> (Ie. oVirt uses to check storage connection with command "dd
>>>>>> if=/rhev/data-center/00000001-0001-0001-0001-0000000002b6/mastersd/dom_md/inbox
>>>>>> iflag=direct,fullblock count=1 bs=1024000”)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if you need more information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -samuli
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Well after upgrade of gluster all I did was start ovirt hosts up
>>>>>> which launched and started their ha-agent and broker processes. I don't
>>>>>> believe I started getting any errors till it mounted GLUSTER1. I had
>>>>>> enabled sharding but had no sharded disk images yet. Not sure if the check
>>>>>> for shards would have caused that. Unfortunately I can't just update this
>>>>>> cluster and try and see what caused it as it has sme VM's users expect to
>>>>>> be available in few hours.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I can see if I can get my test setup to recreate it. I think I'll
>>>>>> need to de-activate data center so I can detach the storage thats on xfs
>>>>>> and attach the one thats over zfs with sharding enabled. My test is 3
>>>>>> bricks on same local machine, with 3 different volumes but I think im
>>>>>> running into sanlock issue or something as it won't mount more than one
>>>>>> volume that was created locally.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Krutika
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, David Gossage <
>>>>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Trimmed out the logs to just about when I was shutting down ovirt
>>>>>> servers for updates which was 14:30 UTC 2016-07-09
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Pre-update settings were
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Volume Name: GLUSTER1
>>>>>> > Type: Replicate
>>>>>> > Volume ID: 167b8e57-28c3-447a-95cc-8410cbdf3f7f
>>>>>> > Status: Started
>>>>>> > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
>>>>>> > Transport-type: tcp
>>>>>> > Bricks:
>>>>>> > Brick1: ccgl1.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
>>>>>> > Brick2: ccgl2.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
>>>>>> > Brick3: ccgl3.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
>>>>>> > Options Reconfigured:
>>>>>> > performance.readdir-ahead: on
>>>>>> > storage.owner-uid: 36
>>>>>> > storage.owner-gid: 36
>>>>>> > performance.quick-read: off
>>>>>> > performance.read-ahead: off
>>>>>> > performance.io-cache: off
>>>>>> > performance.stat-prefetch: off
>>>>>> > cluster.eager-lock: enable
>>>>>> > network.remote-dio: enable
>>>>>> > cluster.quorum-type: auto
>>>>>> > cluster.server-quorum-type: server
>>>>>> > server.allow-insecure: on
>>>>>> > cluster.self-heal-window-size: 1024
>>>>>> > cluster.background-self-heal-count: 16
>>>>>> > performance.strict-write-ordering: off
>>>>>> > nfs.disable: on
>>>>>> > nfs.addr-namelookup: off
>>>>>> > nfs.enable-ino32: off
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > At the time of updates ccgl3 was offline from bad nic on server but
>>>>>> had been so for about a week with no issues in volume
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Shortly after update I added these settings to enable sharding but
>>>>>> did not as of yet have any VM images sharded.
>>>>>> > features.shard-block-size: 64MB
>>>>>> > features.shard: on
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > David Gossage
>>>>>> > Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator
>>>>>> > Office 708.613.2284
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <
>>>>>> kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi David,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Could you also share the brick logs from the affected volume?
>>>>>> They're located at /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/<
>>>>>> hyphenated-path-to-the-brick-directory>.log.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Also, could you share the volume configuration (output of `gluster
>>>>>> volume info <VOL>`) for the affected volume(s) AND at the time you actually
>>>>>> saw this issue?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Krutika
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:23 PM, David Gossage <
>>>>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Scott <romracer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi David,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > My backend storage is ZFS.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I thought about moving from FUSE to NFS mounts for my Gluster
>>>>>> volumes to help test. But since I use hosted engine this would be a real
>>>>>> pain. Its difficult to modify the storage domain type/path in the
>>>>>> hosted-engine.conf. And I don't want to go through the process of
>>>>>> re-deploying hosted engine.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I found this
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347553
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Not sure if related.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > But I also have zfs backend, another user in gluster mailing list
>>>>>> had issues and used zfs backend although she used proxmox and got it
>>>>>> working by changing disk to writeback cache I think it was.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I also use hosted engine, but I run my gluster volume for HE
>>>>>> actually on a LVM separate from zfs on xfs and if i recall it did not have
>>>>>> the issues my gluster on zfs did. I'm wondering now if the issue was zfs
>>>>>> settings.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hopefully should have a test machone up soon I can play around with
>>>>>> more.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Scott
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:36 AM David Gossage <
>>>>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > What back end storage do you run gluster on? xfs/zfs/ext4 etc?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > David Gossage
>>>>>> > Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator
>>>>>> > Office 708.613.2284
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Scott <romracer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > I get similar problems with oVirt 4.0.1 and hosted engine. After
>>>>>> upgrading all my hosts to Gluster 3.7.13 (client and server), I get the
>>>>>> following:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > $ sudo hosted-engine --set-maintenance --mode=none
>>>>>> > Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 162, in
>>>>>> _run_module_as_main
>>>>>> > "__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in _run_code
>>>>>> > exec code in run_globals
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_setup/set_maintenance.py",
>>>>>> line 73, in <module>
>>>>>> > if not maintenance.set_mode(sys.argv[1]):
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_setup/set_maintenance.py",
>>>>>> line 61, in set_mode
>>>>>> > value=m_global,
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/client/client.py",
>>>>>> line 259, in set_maintenance_mode
>>>>>> > str(value))
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/client/client.py",
>>>>>> line 204, in set_global_md_flag
>>>>>> > all_stats = broker.get_stats_from_storage(service)
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/lib/brokerlink.py",
>>>>>> line 232, in get_stats_from_storage
>>>>>> > result = self._checked_communicate(request)
>>>>>> > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/lib/brokerlink.py",
>>>>>> line 260, in _checked_communicate
>>>>>> > .format(message or response))
>>>>>> > ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.lib.exceptions.RequestError: Request
>>>>>> failed: failed to read metadata: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > If I only upgrade one host, then things will continue to work but
>>>>>> my nodes are constantly healing shards. My logs are also flooded with:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:14.137734] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274714: READ => -1 gfid=4
>>>>>> > 41f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429 fd=0x7f19bc0041d0 (Operation
>>>>>> not permitted)
>>>>>> > The message "W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-data-client-0: remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]"
>>>>>> repeated 6 times between [2016-07-21 13:13:24.134985] and [2016-07-21
>>>>>> 13:15:04.132226]
>>>>>> > The message "W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-data-client-1: remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]"
>>>>>> repeated 8 times between [2016-07-21 13:13:34.133116] and [2016-07-21
>>>>>> 13:15:14.137178]
>>>>>> > The message "W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-data-client-2: remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]"
>>>>>> repeated 7 times between [2016-07-21 13:13:24.135071] and [2016-07-21
>>>>>> 13:15:14.137666]
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:24.134647] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-data-client-0: remote
>>>>>> operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:24.134764] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-data-client-2: remote
>>>>>> operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:24.134793] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274741: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0038f4 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:34.135413] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274756: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0041d0 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:44.141062] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274818: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0038f4 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:54.133582] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-data-client-1: remote
>>>>>> operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:15:54.133629] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274853: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0036d8 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:16:04.133666] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274879: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0041d0 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> > [2016-07-21 13:16:14.134954] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 274894: READ => -1 gfid=441f2789-f6b1-4918-a280-1b9905a11429
>>>>>> fd=0x7f19bc0036d8 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Scott
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:57 AM Frank Rothenstein <
>>>>>> f.rothenstein at bodden-kliniken.de> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hey Devid,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I have the very same problem on my test-cluster, despite on running
>>>>>> ovirt 4.0.
>>>>>> > If you access your volumes via NFS all is fine, problem is FUSE. I
>>>>>> stayed on 3.7.13, but have no solution yet, now I use NFS.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Frank
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.07.2016, 04:28 -0500 schrieb David Gossage:
>>>>>> >> Anyone running one of recent 3.6.x lines and gluster using
>>>>>> 3.7.13? I am looking to upgrade gluster from 3.7.11->3.7.13 for some bug
>>>>>> fixes, but have been told by users on gluster mail list due to some gluster
>>>>>> changes I'd need to change the disk parameters to use writeback cache.
>>>>>> Something to do with aio support being removed.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I believe this could be done with custom parameters? But I
>>>>>> believe strage tests are done using dd and would they fail with current
>>>>>> settings then? Last upgrade to 3.7.13 I had to rollback to 3.7.11 due to
>>>>>> stability isues where gluster storage would go into down state and always
>>>>>> show N/A as space available/used. Even if hosts saw storage still and VM's
>>>>>> were running on it on all 3 hosts.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Saw a lot of messages like these that went away once gluster
>>>>>> rollback finished
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:46.935694] I [fuse-bridge.c:4083:fuse_init]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: FUSE inited with protocol versions: glusterfs 7.22 kernel
>>>>>> 7.22
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:49.555466] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-GLUSTER1-client-1:
>>>>>> remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:49.556574] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-GLUSTER1-client-0:
>>>>>> remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:49.556659] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 80: READ => -1 gfid=deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>>>>>> fd=0x7f5224002f68 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:59.612477] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-GLUSTER1-client-1:
>>>>>> remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:59.613700] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops.c:3050:client3_3_readv_cbk] 0-GLUSTER1-client-0:
>>>>>> remote operation failed [Operation not permitted]
>>>>>> >> [2016-07-09 15:27:59.613781] W [fuse-bridge.c:2227:fuse_readv_cbk]
>>>>>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 168: READ => -1 gfid=deb61291-5176-4b81-8315-3f1cf8e3534d
>>>>>> fd=0x7f5224002f68 (Operation not permitted)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> David Gossage
>>>>>> >> Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator
>>>>>> >> Office 708.613.2284
>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> Users mailing list
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Users at ovirt.org
>>>>>> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>> __________________
>>>>>> > BODDEN-KLINIKEN Ribnitz-Damgarten GmbH
>>>>>> > Sandhufe 2
>>>>>> > 18311 Ribnitz-Damgarten
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Telefon: 03821-700-0
>>>>>> > Fax: 03821-700-240
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > E-Mail: info at bodden-kliniken.de Internet:
>>>>>> http://www.bodden-kliniken.de
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sitz: Ribnitz-Damgarten, Amtsgericht: Stralsund, HRB 2919,
>>>>>> Steuer-Nr.: 079/133/40188
>>>>>> > Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: Carmen Schröter, Geschäftsführer: Dr.
>>>>>> Falko Milski
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist ausschließlich für den bezeichneten
>>>>>> Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorge-
>>>>>> > sehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten,
>>>>>> beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der Veröf-
>>>>>> > fentlichung, Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser
>>>>>> E-Mail unzulässig ist. Wir bitten Sie, sofort den
>>>>>> > Absender zu informieren und die E-Mail zu löschen.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Bodden-Kliniken Ribnitz-Damgarten GmbH 2016
>>>>>> > *** Virenfrei durch Kerio Mail Server und Sophos Antivirus ***
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Users mailing list
>>>>>> > Users at ovirt.org
>>>>>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Users mailing list
>>>>>> > Users at ovirt.org
>>>>>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Users mailing list
>>>>>> > Users at ovirt.org
>>>>>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160813/6bbab6c6/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list