Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] VDSM Broken dependencies on master

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me. > please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0. this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not used. > > > Petr > > 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tried >>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/... >>> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it. >>> >>> However, openstack-kilo is ok. >>> >> >> Just another question, is it ok if I add a >> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/ >> instead? >> it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm >> <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/open... >> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there. >> >> This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS >> Virt SIG oVirt releases. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Petr >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>>>> > *Hi:* >>>>> > >>>>> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch >>>>> > from check-custom-el7 >>>>> > >>>>> > *06:37:41* unresolved deps: >>>>> > >>>>> > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2 >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI... >>>>> > >>>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP. >>>>> >>>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently. >>>>> >>>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still >>>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test. >>>>> >>>>> However, can we instead add >>>>> >>>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/ >>>>> to the repos available to this job? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7 >>>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job. >>>>> >>>>> Dan. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sandro Bonazzola >>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community >>>> collaboration. >>>> See how it works at redhat.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sandro Bonazzola >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >> See how it works at redhat.com >> > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com