[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com > > ha scritto: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > Top posting > > > > > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability > > > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for > > > this decision. (as Niels stated) > > > > > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is > > > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly > > > the best outcome for this issue > > > > Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* > > packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do > > now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the > > centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS > > Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available). > > > > > Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in > Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 > or backport it on Fedora 28 We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide the packages here: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/ Can you use that repository?

Niels > > > > > Niels > > > > > > > > > > Shyam > > > > > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > >>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's > > safe to > > > >>>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt > > 4.3: > > > >>>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and > > ppc64le[2] > > > >>>> > > > >>>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a > > > >>>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on > > glusterd which > > > >>>> should work with current oVirt code. > > > >>> > > > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. > > glusterd2 > > > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in. > > > >>> > > > >>> HTH, > > > >>> Niels > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the > > > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available > > > >> > > > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. > > > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in > > CentOS? > > > > > > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for > > > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds > > > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a > > > > few days? > > > > > > > > Niels > > > > > > > > > -- > > SANDRO BONAZZOLA > > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > > sbonazzo(a)redhat.com > <https://red.ht/sig>