On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more
importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures.
I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak slave
utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older Fedora
versions.
I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide testing is
useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time...
Nir, with your experience - does it worth it?
How about having "rawhide" as non-voting?
You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' script
that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process
return value.
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. |
redhat.com/trusted