----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:16:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] operation mode
On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> The same question applies to HypervisorType, since only KVM is
> supported.
I think this one is worth a bit more thinking before removing
actually,
but if you remove it in a single patch, easy enough to revert should
we
want to add something like this back (and the enum is far from all
that
needs to be done anyway for such a thing)
Do you plan to support hypervisors other than qemu+kvm?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 9:43:14 AM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] operation mode
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just run into this. Vm's have an OperationMode attribute,
>> it
>> can be FullVirtualized or ParaVirtualized. It appears the
>> attribute
>> does not play in any decision, not sent to vdsm. Can it be removed
>> or anyone need it?
>>
>> thx,
>> Laszlo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>