I also agree with the proposal. It's sad to turn in my keys but I'm likely unable to perform many duties expected of a maintainer at this point. I know that people can still find me via the git history :) On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:37 AM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/27/19 3:25 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
I want to remove inactive contributors from vdsm-master-maintainers.
I suggest the simple rule of 2 years of inactivity for removing from this group, based on git log.
See the list below for current status: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/groups/106,members
No objections, keeping the list minimal and current is a good idea.
I love removing dead code; I feel a bit different about removing old colleagues. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic.
If we introduce this policy (which I understand is healthy), let us give a long warning period (6 months?) before we apply the policy to existing dormant maintainers. We should also make sure that we actively try to contact a person before he or she is dropped.
I think this is a reasonable proposal.
Regards, Milan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/QCMGKR2IRYTITM...
-- Adam Litke He / Him / His Principle Software Engineer Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> alitke@redhat.com @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://redhat.com/summit>