Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] [QA] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francesco Romani" <fromani(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org, Users(a)ovirt.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 6:56:28 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [QA] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: Users(a)ovirt.org, devel(a)ovirt.org >> Cc: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt;, >> "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt;, "David >> Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com&gt;, >> ykaplan(a)redhat.com, "Tal Nisan" >> <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Mooli Tayer" <mtayer(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Francesco Romani" >> <fromani(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Adam Litke" >> <alitke(a)redhat.com&gt; >> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:43:40 PM >> Subject: [QA] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status >> >> Hi, >> tomorrow we should compose oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 starting at 08:00 UTC >> We still have the following blockers list: > > >> 1127460 virt NEW VM abnormal stop after extending when using thin >> provisioning on block storage > > [...] > > Analysis doesn't show yet a bug on VDSM, which seems to behave correctly > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127460#c6 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127460#c7 > > NEEDINFO requests to QEMU and LVM maintainers are been sent, no answer yet. > > Since this was marked as blocker, I'll invest more time on this and will look > for a workaround, > if possible, within the end of the week. This is very bad bug, but not a vdsm regression. It is broken in vdsm 3.4 and it will be still broken in vdsm 3.5, since getting fixes from qemu/kvm/lvm takes lot of time.

Nir