[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Top posting > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for > this decision. (as Niels stated) > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly > the best outcome for this issue Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster* packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).

Niels > > Shyam > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to > >>>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0. > >>>> > >>>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3: > >>>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2] > >>>> > >>>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a > >>>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which > >>>> should work with current oVirt code. > >>> > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2 > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in. > >>> > >>> HTH, > >>> Niels > >>> > >>> > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available > >> > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5. > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS? > > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a > > few days? > > > > Niels > >