Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA status

There is no misuse when optional argument is not used. But hosted engine uses the timeout parameter anyway so you can assume it is not a blocker for us. Martin On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > As Irit mentioned the provided reproduction steps are wrong (misuse of > the code) and she posted correct example showing that jsonrpc code works as > expected. So Martin/Simone are you using somewhere in HE code the original > example that is misusing the client? > > Thanks > > Martin > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> From the latest comment it doesn't seem like a blocker to me. >> Martin S. - your thoughts? >> >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> We have a proposed blocker for the release: >>> 1527155 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527155> Infra >>> vdsm Bindings-API igoihman(a)redhat.com NEW jsonrpc reconnect logic does >>> not work and gets stuck >>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527155> urgent >>> unspecified ovirt-4.2.0 04:30:30 >>> >>> Please review and either approve the blcoker or postpone to 4.2.1. >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA >>> >>> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D >>> >>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> > > > -- > Martin Perina > Associate Manager, Software Engineering > Red Hat Czech s.r.o. >