From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:39:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
On 14/02/2013 13:23, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed
>> to
>> create the PG DB.
>> The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream
>> code.
>> Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run
>> both
>> on 8.4.x and 9.x
>> the question is if we should ?
>>
>
> if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people
> also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page:
>
http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites
>
>> I will be happy to hear your opinion on that.
>>
>> thanks
we plan to release formal .el6 ovirt packages in the project, which
many
people use, so yes, need to support both.
>>
>> Eli Meiska
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel