----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org&gt; > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM > Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream > > Hi > > We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to > create the PG DB. > The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream > code. > Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both > on 8.4.x and 9.x > the question is if we should ? > if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page: http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites > I will be happy to hear your opinion on that. > > thanks

> > Eli Meiska > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

From: "Allon Mureinik" <amureini(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org&gt; Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:34:53 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org&gt; > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:39:45 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream > > On 14/02/2013 13:23, Omer Frenkel wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org&gt; > >> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM > >> Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> We came to the problem when some developers took latest and > >> failed > >> to > >> create the PG DB. > >> The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with > >> upstream > >> code. > >> Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run > >> both > >> on 8.4.x and 9.x > >> the question is if we should ? > >> > > > > if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people > > also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites > > page: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites > > > >> I will be happy to hear your opinion on that. > >> > >> thanks > > we plan to release formal .el6 ovirt packages in the project, which > many > people use, so yes, need to support both. Suggested solution: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/12076

> > > >> > >> Eli Meiska > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Engine-devel mailing list > >> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel