[ovirt-devel] Re: OST fails, nothing provides nmstate

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:12 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:15 PM Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:03 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:48 PM Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:16 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:57 PM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:54 PM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:48 PM Nir Soffer < > nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 18:18 Marcin Sobczyk < > msobczyk(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 11/22/19 4:54 PM, Martin Perina wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:43 PM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:00 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora > Barroso <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:54 AM Vojtech Juranek < > vjuranek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > On pátek 22. listopadu 2019 9:56:56 CET Miguel Duarte > de Mora Barroso wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:49 AM Vojtech Juranek < > vjuranek(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > On pátek 22. listopadu 2019 9:41:26 CET Dominik > Holler wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Dominik Holler < > dholler(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:54 PM Nir Soffer < > nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:24 PM Vojtech > Juranek > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> <vjuranek(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Hi, > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > OST fails (see e.g. [1]) in > 002_bootstrap.check_update_host. It > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > fails > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> with > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > FAILED! => {"changed": false, "failures": > [], "msg": "Depsolve > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Error > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> occured: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > \n Problem 1: cannot install the best > update candidate for package > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > vdsm- > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > network-4.40.0-1236.git63ea8cb8b.el8.x86_64\n - nothing provides > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> nmstate > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > needed by > vdsm-network-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.x86_64\n > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Problem 2: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > package > vdsm-python-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.noarch requires > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> vdsm-network > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > = 4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8, but none > of the providers can be > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> installed\n > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > - cannot install the best update candidate > for package vdsm- > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > python-4.40.0-1236.git63ea8cb8b.el8.noarch\n - nothing provides > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > nmstate > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > needed by > vdsm-network-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.x86_64\n > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> nmstate should be provided by copr repo > enabled by > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> ovirt-release-master. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > I re-triggered as > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6131 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > maybe > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104825/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > was missing > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > Looks like > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104825/ is > ignored by OST. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > maybe not. You re-triggered with [1], which > really missed this patch. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > I did a rebase and now running with this patch in > build #6132 [2]. Let's > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > wait > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > for it to see if gerrit #104825 helps. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > [1] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-manual-runner/909/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > [2] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6132/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > Miguel, do you think merging > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104495/15/common/yum-repos/ovirt-master-hos > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > t-cq > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > .repo.in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > would solve this? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > I've split the patch Dominik mentions above in two, > one of them adding > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > the nmstate / networkmanager copr repos - [3]. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > Let's see if it fixes it. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > it fixes original issue, but OST still fails in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > 098_ovirt_provider_ovn.use_ovn_provider: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I think Dominik was looking into this issue; +Dominik > Holler please confirm. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Let me know if you need any help Dominik. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The problem is that the hosts lost connection to storage: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134/artifact/exp... > : > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2019-11-22 05:39:12,326-0500 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) > [common.commands] /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /usr/bin/sudo -n > /sbin/lvm vgs --config 'devices { preferred_names=["^/dev/mapper/"] > ignore_suspended_devices=1 write_cache_state=0 > disable_after_error_count=3 > filter=["a|^/dev/mapper/36001405107ea8b4e3ac4ddeb3e19890f$|^/dev/mapper/360014054924c91df75e41178e4b8a80c$|^/dev/mapper/3600140561c0d02829924b77ab7323f17$|^/dev/mapper/3600140582feebc04ca5409a99660dbbc$|^/dev/mapper/36001405c3c53755c13c474dada6be354$|", > "r|.*|"] } global { locking_type=1 prioritise_write_locks=1 > wait_for_locks=1 use_lvmetad=0 } backup { retain_min=50 retain_days=0 }' > --noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator '|' --ignoreskippedcluster -o > uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name > (cwd None) (commands:153) > >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2019-11-22 05:39:12,415-0500 ERROR (check/loop) > [storage.Monitor] Error checking path /rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata > (monitor:501) > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): > >> >> >> >>>>>>> File > "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line 499, in > _pathChecked > >> >> >> >>>>>>> delay = result.delay() > >> >> >> >>>>>>> File > "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/check.py", line 391, in delay > >> >> >> >>>>>>> raise exception.MiscFileReadException(self.path, > self.rc, self.err) > >> >> >> >>>>>>> vdsm.storage.exception.MiscFileReadException: Internal > file read failure: ('/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata', > 1, 'Read timeout') > >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2019-11-22 05:39:12,416-0500 INFO (check/loop) > [storage.Monitor] Domain d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a became > INVALID (monitor:472) > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> I failed to reproduce local to analyze this, I will try > again, any hints welcome. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104925/1/ shows that > 008_basic_ui_sanity.py triggers the problem. > >> >> >> >>>>>> Is there someone with knowledge about the basic_ui_sanity > around? > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> How do you think it's related? By commenting out the ui > sanity tests and seeing OST with successful finish? > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> Looking at 6134 run you were discussing: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> - timing of the ui sanity set-up [1]: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> 11:40:20 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> - timing of first encountered storage error [2]: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> 2019-11-22 05:39:12,415-0500 ERROR (check/loop) > [storage.Monitor] Error checking path /rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata > (monitor:501) > >> >> >> >>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): > >> >> >> >>>>> File > "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line 499, in > _pathChecked > >> >> >> >>>>> delay = result.delay() > >> >> >> >>>>> File > "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/check.py", line 391, in delay > >> >> >> >>>>> raise exception.MiscFileReadException(self.path, > self.rc, self.err) > >> >> >> >>>>> vdsm.storage.exception.MiscFileReadException: Internal > file read failure: ('/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata', > 1, 'Read timeout') > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> Timezone difference aside, it seems to me that these > storage errors occured before doing anything ui-related. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> You are right, a time.sleep(8*60) in > >> >> >> >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104925/2 > >> >> >> >> has triggers the issue the same way. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> So this is a test issues, assuming that the UI tests can > complete in > >> >> >> less than 8 minutes? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > To my eyes this looks like storage is just stop working after > some time. > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Nir or Steve, can you please confirm that this is a storage > problem? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Why do you think we have a storage problem? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I understand from the posted log snippets that they say that the > storage is not accessible anymore, > >> >> > >> >> No, so far one read timeout was reported, this does not mean storage > >> >> is not available anymore. > >> >> It can be temporary issue that does not harm anything. > >> >> > >> >> > while the host is still responsive. > >> >> > This might be triggered by something outside storage, e.g. the > network providing the storage stopped working, > >> >> > But I think a possible next step in analysing this issue would be > to find the reason why storage is not happy. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Sounds like there was a miscommunication in this thread. > >> > I try to address all of your points, please let me know if something > is missing or not clearly expressed. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> First step is to understand which test fails, > >> > > >> > > >> > 098_ovirt_provider_ovn.use_ovn_provider > >> > > >> >> > >> >> and why. This can be done by the owner of the test, > >> > > >> > > >> > The test was added by the network team. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> understanding what the test does > >> > > >> > > >> > The test tries to add a vNIC. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> and what is the expected system behavior. > >> >> > >> > > >> > It is expected that adding a vNIC works, because the VM should be up. > >> > >> What was the actual behavior? > >> > >> >> If the owner of the test thinks that the test failed because of a > storage issue > >> > > >> > > >> > I am not sure who is the owner, but I do. > >> > >> Can you explain why how a vNIC failed because of a storage issue? > >> > > > > > > Test fails with: > > > > Cannot add a Network Interface when VM is not Down, Up or Image-Locked. > > > > engine.log says: > > {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": > "|virt|VM_status|308bd254-9af9-4570-98ea-822609550acf", "params": > {"308bd254-9af9-4570-98ea-822609550acf": {"status": "Paused", "pauseCode": > "EOTHER", "ioerror": {"alias": "ua-953dd722-5e8b-4b24-bccd-a2a5d5befeb6", > "name": "vda", "path": > "/rhev/data-center/38c691d4-8556-4882-8f04-a88dff5d0973/bcd1622c-876b-460c-95a7-d09536c42ffe/images/953dd722-5e8b-4b24-bccd-a2a5d5befeb6/dcb5fec4-f219-4d3f-986c-628b0d00b349"}}, > "notify_time": 4298388570}} > > So you think adding vNIC failed because the VM was paused? > > Yes, because of the error message "Cannot add a Network Interface when VM is not Down, Up or Image-Locked." > > vdsm.log says: > > > > 2019-11-20 10:51:06,026-0500 ERROR (check/loop) [storage.Monitor] Error > checking path /rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share1/bcd1622c-876b-460c-95a7-d09536c42ffe/dom_md/metadata > (monitor:501) > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line > 499, in _pathChecked > > delay = result.delay() > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/check.py", line > 391, in delay > > raise exception.MiscFileReadException(self.path, self.rc, self.err) > > vdsm.storage.exception.MiscFileReadException: Internal file read > failure: ('/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share1/bcd1622c-876b-460c-95a7-d09536c42ffe/dom_md/metadata', > 1, 'Read timeout') > > Is this related to the paused vm? > > The log entry : '{"status": "Paused", "pauseCode": "EOTHER", "ioerror"' makes me thinking this. > You did not provide a timestamp for the engine event above. > > I can't find last weeks log, maybe they are faded out already. Please find more recent logs in https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/6492 > > ... > > > > 2019-11-20 10:51:56,249-0500 WARN (check/loop) [storage.check] Checker > '/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/64daa060-1d83-46b9-b7e8-72a902e1134b/dom_md/metadata' > is blocked for 60.00 seconds (check:282) > > 2019-11-20 10:51:56,885-0500 ERROR (monitor/775b710) [storage.Monitor] > Error checking domain 775b7102-7f2c-4eee-a4d0-a41b55451f7e (monitor:427) > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line > 408, in _checkDomainStatus > > self.domain.selftest() > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line > 710, in selftest > > self.oop.os.statvfs(self.domaindir) > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/outOfProcess.py", > line 242, in statvfs > > return self._iop.statvfs(path) > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ioprocess/__init__.py", line > 479, in statvfs > > resdict = self._sendCommand("statvfs", {"path": path}, self.timeout) > > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ioprocess/__init__.py", line > 442, in _sendCommand > > raise Timeout(os.strerror(errno.ETIMEDOUT)) > > ioprocess.Timeout: Connection timed out > > This show that storage was not accessible for 60 seconds (ioprocess > uses 60 seconds timeout). > > 60 seconds timeout is bad. If we have leases on this storage domain > (e.g. SPM lease) they will > expire in 20 seconds after this event and the vdsm on the SPM host > will be killed. > > Do we have network tests changing the network used by the NFS storage > domain before this event? > > No. > What were the changes the network tests or code since OST was successful? > > I am not aware of a change, which might be relevant. Maybe the fact that the hosts are on CentOS 8, while the Engine (storage) is on CentOS 7 is relevant. Also the occurrence of this issue seems not to be 100% deterministic, I guess because it is timing related. The error is reproducible locally by running OST, and just keep the environment alive after basic-suite-master succeeded. After some time, the storage will become inaccessible. > >> Can you explain how adding 8 minutes sleep instead of the UI tests > >> reproduced the issue? > >> > > > > > > This shows that the issue is not triggered by the UI test, but maybe by > passing time. > > Do we run the ovn tests after the UI tests? > > >> >> someone from storage can look at this. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Thanks, I would appreciate this. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> But the fact that adding long sleep reproduce the issue means it is > not related > >> >> in any way to storage. > >> >> > >> >> Nir > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> I remember talking with Steven Rosenberg on IRC a couple > of days ago about some storage metadata issues and he said he got a > response from Nir, that "it's a known issue". > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> Nir, Amit, can you comment on this? > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> The error mentioned here is not vdsm error but warning > about storage accessibility. We sould convert the tracebacks to warning. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> The reason for such issue can be misconfigured network > (maybe network team is testing negative flows?), > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> No. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> or some issue in the NFS server. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Only hint I found is > >> >> >> >>> "Exiting Time2Retain handler because session_reinstatement=1" > >> >> >> >>> but I have no idea what this means or if this is relevant at > all. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> One read timeout is not an issue. We have a real issue only > if we have consistent read timeouts or errors for couple of minutes, after > that engine can deactivate the storage domain or some hosts if only these > hosts are having trouble to access storage. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> In OST we never expect such conditions since we don't test > negative flows, and we should have good connectivity with the vms running > on the same host. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Ack, this seems to be the problem. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> Nir > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> [1] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134/console > >> >> >> >>>>> [2] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134/artifact/exp... > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> Marcin, could you please take a look? > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > [3] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104897/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> Who installs this rpm in OST? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > I do not understand the question. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > [...] > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > See [2] for full error. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Can someone please take a look? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Thanks > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Vojta > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > [1] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6128/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > [2] > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6128/artifact > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> / > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > > exported-artifacts/test_logs/basic-suite-master/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> post-002_bootstrap.py/lago- > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > basic-suite-master-engine/_var_log/ovirt-engine/engine.log___________ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> ____ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> ________________________________>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to > devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > Privacy Statement: > https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > oVirt Code of Conduct: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > List Archives: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/4K5N3VQ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> N26B > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> L73K7D45A2IR7R3UMMM23/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to > devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> Privacy Statement: > https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> oVirt Code of Conduct: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> List Archives: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/JN7MNUZ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> N5K3 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> NS5TGXFCILYES77KI5TZU/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to > devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > Privacy Statement: > https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > oVirt Code of Conduct: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List > Archives: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/UPJ5SEAV5Z65H > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > 5BQ3SCHOYZX6JMTQPBW/ > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> -- > >> >> >> >>>>> Martin Perina > >> >> >> >>>>> Manager, Software Engineering > >> >> >> >>>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o. > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >