1:06 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 1:13:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean create
Good point! Let's see, there are two services initialized there in try-catch
block, therefore the failure of only this two will be tolerated. The two
services are:
- VmPropertiesUtils
- DevicePropertiesUtils
I looked into it and for this two services I would rather let engine fail of
they can not initialize, since that may very likely be caused by missing or
broken configuration and I am not sure the engine would perform right after
the failure of these services.
I agree that upon misconfiguration of the properties the engine should fail, but
we should prevent reaching at that point by validating the inserted data to the
custom properties by the engine config tool during the insertion and not by the
engine startup. Such validation introduced by Martin Perina not long ago, so we
shouldn't fail on invalid values.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 5:37:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean create
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 5:59:34 PM
> > Subject: [Engine-devel] InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean create
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made some mistake in the upgrade of my engine (which is my bad) but
> > then
> > I
> > noticed that when one service initialization fails, the rest of the
> > services
> > are not initialized, but still the engine will start even then and it did
> > not even log.
> >
> > There are some patterns in that single method on initialization, some
> > work
> > with 'try', some spawn a new thread. Can we have this cleaned up?
> > What I was thinking of is that each service should be initialized,
> > creating
> > a
> > thread is it's own business, exceptions from initialization should be
> > caught, logged and engine startup should be prevented if any service
> > fails
> > to initialize.
>
> The question is indeed whether we should really fail in case ANY service
> fails.
> In addition, may I suggest spawning a thread for each one of the services
> (unless there is dependency of course), and wait for completion in order to
> reduce startup time?
>
> >
> > Thx,
> > Laszlo
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel