On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Why is that? In vdsm.spec.in is 'Requires: openvswitch
>= 2'.
Should i
change it to 2.0?
Petr
2015-09-18 14:59 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
>>
>
> please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is
> requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0.
> this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not
> used.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Petr
>>
>> 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I tried
>>>>
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/...
>>>> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
>>>>
>>>> However, openstack-kilo is ok.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just another question, is it ok if I add a
>>>
>>>
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/
>>> instead?
>>> it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>>
<
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/open...
>>> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
>>>
>>> This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS
>>> Virt SIG oVirt releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Petr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg
<danken(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>>>>>> > *Hi:*
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > *06:37:41* package:
vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch
>>>>>> > from check-custom-el7
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > *06:37:41* unresolved deps:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > *06:37:41* openvswitch >= 0:2
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTI...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, can we instead add
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/
>>>>>> to the repos available to this job?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about
Liberty?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7
>>>>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>>> collaboration.
>>>>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>> collaboration.
>>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at
redhat.com
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at