Re: [ovirt-devel] VDSM master fc24 build artifacts fails

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told >>> Sandro that it is his call. >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >>> >>> Thanks all >>> Gil >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/ vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml >>>> >>>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >>>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >> >> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >> >> [1] >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 > > > > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be > able to build and run it. > We can't leave CI broken. Which CI job is broken with f25? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel