On 11/30/2011 05:32 PM, Geert Jansen wrote:
On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
>> Would it be
>> easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool against a QMF-based vdsm
>> API? Would
>> such a tool be able to run on multiple Linux distributions?
> it is supposed to have a cli console.
> cc'ing carl and Ted for more details.
I'm not sure how hard it is technically. But for ISV's, I can tell you
that almost nobody has experience with it.
But, is this intended to be a public API though?
yes, for VDSM.
but if we go with ovirt-lite for single node, they will get exactly the
same REST API as the full engine has.
otherwise they will get a "similar" API, which meand double
btw, i think QMF has a REST bridge, but still it will be a different api
than going the engine-lite approach.