5:50 p.m.
Hi all,
Do we need org.ovirt.engine.core.common.queries.ValueObjectMap?
Can we use a Java map class directly instead (we had to use this with SOAP WS in the past,
prior to current rest-API days)?
Yair
5:53 p.m.
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 05:50:29 PM IST, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
Hi all,
Do we need org.ovirt.engine.core.common.queries.ValueObjectMap?
Can we use a Java map class directly instead (we had to use this with SOAP WS in the
past, prior to current rest-API days)?
Yair
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
I remember too it was for soap because the lack of support in maps.
7:10 a.m.
From: engine-devel-bounces(a)ovirt.org
[mailto:engine-devel-bounces@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Roy Golan
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 17:53 PM
To: Yair Zaslavsky
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Redunant class of ValueObjectMap ?
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 05:50:29 PM IST, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> Hi all,
> Do we need org.ovirt.engine.core.common.queries.ValueObjectMap?
> Can we use a Java map class directly instead (we had to use this with
SOAP WS
in the past, prior to
current rest-API days)?
>
> Yair
I remember too it was for soap because the lack of support in maps.
valueObject* was only used for the SOAP serialization of the Object class.
The backend (engine core) is not supposed to use it anywhere (as in you
should be able to just delete all places using these classes).
Not supposed to need to change anything, since they are supposed to have
extra getters/setters using them just for the serialization sake.
(please add me as reviewer to the patch removing them).
Thanks,
Itamar
4719
days inactive
4720
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Itamar Heim -
Roy Golan -
Yair Zaslavsky