Thanks Yaniv.
Sandro, where should the fix be. In Engine or on the Node level?
To me it sounds like this should be fixed in Engine.
- fabian
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>> the size went down to ~800MB again in master.
>>
>> The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree.
>> The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack
>> which we are pulling in.
>>
>
> You can drop it by requireing java headless instead of java at runtime in
> ovirt-engine I think.
>
>
I've opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401931 to track
this issue.
Y.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> - fabian
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> > I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big.
>> > 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2].
>> > Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Y.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt...
>> > [2]
>> >
>> >
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-en...
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel(a)ovirt.org
>> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch(a)redhat.com>
>> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor
>> Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at
redhat.com