ovirt-appliance (today) is 1.5G...
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it? Thanks, Y. [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-en... [2] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-engin...
Heya, the size went down to ~800MB again in master. The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack which we are pulling in. - fabian On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
Thanks, Y.
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-en... [2] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-engin...
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor Red Hat
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> wrote:
Heya,
the size went down to ~800MB again in master.
The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack which we are pulling in.
You can drop it by requireing java headless instead of java at runtime in ovirt-engine I think.
- fabian
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
Thanks, Y.
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/ el7/noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.1-20160927.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm [2] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/ el7/noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.0-20161003.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor Red Hat _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> wrote:
Heya,
the size went down to ~800MB again in master.
The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack which we are pulling in.
You can drop it by requireing java headless instead of java at runtime in ovirt-engine I think.
I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401931 to track
this issue. Y.
- fabian
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
Thanks, Y.
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7 /noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.1-20160927.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm [2] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/ noarch/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.0-20161003.1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor Red Hat _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
Thanks Yaniv. Sandro, where should the fix be. In Engine or on the Node level? To me it sounds like this should be fixed in Engine. - fabian On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> wrote:
Heya,
the size went down to ~800MB again in master.
The best opportunity to reduce the size is to trim the dependency tree. The lowest hanging fruit is to get rid of the (partial) X11 stack which we are pulling in.
You can drop it by requireing java headless instead of java at runtime in ovirt-engine I think.
I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401931 to track this issue. Y.
- fabian
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm sure it was less just days ago, but now[1] it is again quite big. 4.0's is 'only' 1G in size[2]. Which anyway raises the question - should we provide delta RPMs for it?
Thanks, Y.
[1]
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-en... [2]
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.0-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ovirt-engin...
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com> Associate Manager, RHV Hypervisor Red Hat _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
participants (3)
-
Fabian Deutsch -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Yaniv Kaul