On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, Now that we moved to the version branch.
Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED that we'll be sure its OK?
Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never move bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed ready, or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's safer to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to MODIFIED, than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more work.
You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in the past. This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and increasing the amount of bugs that are not verified on time. Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do more damage than good.
e.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan@redhat.com> wrote:
After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 branch the bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened yesterday
the
bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch as well
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- Eyal Edri Associate Manager EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel
phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- Didi
-- Eyal Edri Associate Manager EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)