Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, Now that we moved to the version branch. Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED that we'll be sure its OK?

e. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 branch the > bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened yesterday the > bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch as well > > > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > Infra(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > -- Eyal Edri Associate Manager EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, > > Now that we moved to the version branch. > > > > Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED that > > we'll > > be sure its OK? > > Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never move > bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed > ready, > or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's > safer > to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to MODIFIED, > than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more work. > You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in the past. This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and increasing the amount of bugs that are not verified on time. Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do more damage than good.

> > > > > e. > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 branch > >> the > >> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened yesterday > >> the > >> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch as > >> well > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Infra mailing list > >> Infra(a)ovirt.org > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Eyal Edri > > Associate Manager > > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > Red Hat Israel > > > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Infra mailing list > > Infra(a)ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > > > > > > -- > Didi -- Eyal Edri Associate Manager EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)

It makes life easier for everyone when automation moves the bug to MODIFIED, if the work is not done then the developer can always move it back to POST like we sometimes do. In any way, when a 3.6.3 bug is merged in 3.6.3 it should be moved to MODIFIED, not a second before On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, > >> > Now that we moved to the version branch. > >> > > >> > Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED that > >> > we'll > >> > be sure its OK? > >> > >> Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never > move > >> bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed > >> ready, > >> or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's > >> safer > >> to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to > MODIFIED, > >> than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more > work. > >> > > > > You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in the > > past. > > This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and > increasing > > the amount of > > bugs that are not verified on time. > > > > Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do more > > damage than good. > > Perhaps, then, run it once a day and move to MODIFIED only if last patch > was merged at least X hours ago? Hopefully developers will not wait more > than X before pushing an additional patch for the same bug if needed. > > Of course, we then also have to fix the issue starting current thread. > > > > >> > >> > > >> > e. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 branch > >> >> the > >> >> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened > yesterday > >> >> the > >> >> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch as > >> >> well > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Infra mailing list > >> >> Infra(a)ovirt.org > >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Eyal Edri > >> > Associate Manager > >> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > >> > Red Hat Israel > >> > > >> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > >> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Infra mailing list > >> > Infra(a)ovirt.org > >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Didi > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eyal Edri > > Associate Manager > > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > Red Hat Israel > > > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > > -- > Didi >

This was the behavior in 3.6.2, don't know why it changed On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > so maybe we'll stop moving bugs to MODIFIED if they are merged on stable > branch (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6) and only if its merged into a version branch > (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6.3) ? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> It makes life easier for everyone when automation moves the bug to >> MODIFIED, if the work is not done then the developer can always move it >> back to POST like we sometimes do. >> In any way, when a 3.6.3 bug is merged in 3.6.3 it should be moved to >> MODIFIED, not a second before >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >> > Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, >>> >> > Now that we moved to the version branch. >>> >> > >>> >> > Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED >>> that >>> >> > we'll >>> >> > be sure its OK? >>> >> >>> >> Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never >>> move >>> >> bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed >>> >> ready, >>> >> or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's >>> >> safer >>> >> to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to >>> MODIFIED, >>> >> than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more >>> work. >>> >> >>> > >>> > You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in >>> the >>> > past. >>> > This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and >>> increasing >>> > the amount of >>> > bugs that are not verified on time. >>> > >>> > Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do >>> more >>> > damage than good. >>> >>> Perhaps, then, run it once a day and move to MODIFIED only if last patch >>> was merged at least X hours ago? Hopefully developers will not wait more >>> than X before pushing an additional patch for the same bug if needed. >>> >>> Of course, we then also have to fix the issue starting current thread. >>> >>> > >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > e. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 >>> branch >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened >>> yesterday >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch >>> as >>> >> >> well >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> Infra mailing list >>> >> >> Infra(a)ovirt.org >>> >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Eyal Edri >>> >> > Associate Manager >>> >> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D >>> >> > Red Hat Israel >>> >> > >>> >> > phone: +972-9-7692018 >>> >> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Infra mailing list >>> >> > Infra(a)ovirt.org >>> >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Didi >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Eyal Edri >>> > Associate Manager >>> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D >>> > Red Hat Israel >>> > >>> > phone: +972-9-7692018 >>> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Didi >>> >> >> > > > -- > Eyal Edri > Associate Manager > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > Red Hat Israel > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >

On 01/28 16:17, Eyal Edri wrote: > David, > Is it something manual we need to change per version or we can add > something automatic to work on any 3.6.X branch only (exluding the 3.6 > branch)? Can you summarize the complete checks that should be done on the hooks side? Because it's starting to be a bit of a mess as we are changing small things each time without the complete knowledge (for example, the target release was being checked before when moving to MODIFIED, and that was commented out, and there's a hook to warn if the patch is not merged yet on a previous branch, like not being merged on 3.6 if it's on 3.6.x) > > e. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > This was the behavior in 3.6.2, don't know why it changed > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > >> so maybe we'll stop moving bugs to MODIFIED if they are merged on stable > >> branch (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6) and only if its merged into a version branch > >> (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6.3) ? > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >>> It makes life easier for everyone when automation moves the bug to > >>> MODIFIED, if the work is not done then the developer can always move it > >>> back to POST like we sometimes do. > >>> In any way, when a 3.6.3 bug is merged in 3.6.3 it should be moved to > >>> MODIFIED, not a second before > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar David < didi(a)redhat.com&gt; > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David < didi(a)redhat.com > >>>> > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >> > Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, > >>>> >> > Now that we moved to the version branch. > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED > >>>> that > >>>> >> > we'll > >>>> >> > be sure its OK? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never > >>>> move > >>>> >> bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed > >>>> >> ready, > >>>> >> or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's > >>>> >> safer > >>>> >> to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to > >>>> MODIFIED, > >>>> >> than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more > >>>> work. > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in > >>>> the > >>>> > past. > >>>> > This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and > >>>> increasing > >>>> > the amount of > >>>> > bugs that are not verified on time. > >>>> > > >>>> > Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do > >>>> more > >>>> > damage than good. > >>>> > >>>> Perhaps, then, run it once a day and move to MODIFIED only if last patch > >>>> was merged at least X hours ago? Hopefully developers will not wait more > >>>> than X before pushing an additional patch for the same bug if needed. > >>>> > >>>> Of course, we then also have to fix the issue starting current thread. > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > e. > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 > >>>> branch > >>>> >> >> the > >>>> >> >> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened > >>>> yesterday > >>>> >> >> the > >>>> >> >> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch > >>>> as > >>>> >> >> well > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >>>> >> >> Infra mailing list > >>>> >> >> Infra(a)ovirt.org > >>>> >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > -- > >>>> >> > Eyal Edri > >>>> >> > Associate Manager > >>>> >> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > >>>> >> > Red Hat Israel > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > >>>> >> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ > >>>> >> > Infra mailing list > >>>> >> > Infra(a)ovirt.org > >>>> >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> Didi > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Eyal Edri > >>>> > Associate Manager > >>>> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > >>>> > Red Hat Israel > >>>> > > >>>> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > >>>> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Didi > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Eyal Edri > >> Associate Manager > >> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > >> Red Hat Israel > >> > >> phone: +972-9-7692018 > >> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > >> > > > > > > > -- > Eyal Edri > Associate Manager > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > Red Hat Israel > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) -- David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605

On 02/03 08:55, Eyal Edri wrote: > Do we have a place where all the current logic of the hooks is described? > I can use it as a base and adjust each one to the new logic we need. Not really, we have the code, but the task to properly document was never finished (in part because it's been changing quite often) and the task to puppetize has been in the backburner (also because gerrit itself is not in puppet, so it's not straight-forward). The best you can do is go to gerrit through ssh (port 22) and ls /home/gerrit2/review_site/git/ovirt-engine.git/hooks. [root@gerrit ~]# ls /home/gerrit2/review_site/git/ovirt-engine.git/hooks/change-abandoned.update_tracker change-merged.set_MODIFIED change-merged.update_tracker comment-added.propagate_review_values config patchset-created.bz.0.has_bug_url patchset-created.bz.1.is_public patchset-created.bz.2.correct_product patchset-created.bz.3.correct_target_milestone patchset-created.bz.98.set_POST patchset-created.bz.99.review_ok patchset-created.update_tracker patchset-created.warn_if_not_merged_to_previous_branch update_tracker For the config you have: ## Branches to take into account BRANCHES=('ovirt-engine-3.6' 'ovirt-engine-3.6.0' 'ovirt-engine-3.6.1' 'ovirt-engine-3.6.2' 'ovirt-engine-3.5' 'ovirt-engine-3.4' 'ovirt-engine-3.3' 'engine_3.2' 'engine_3.1' 'ovirt-engine-3.5.2' 'ovirt-engine-3.4.0' 'ovirt-engine-3.3.4' 'ovirt-engine-3.3.3' 'ovirt-engine-3.3.2' 'ovirt-engine-3.3.1') STABLE_BRANCHES="ovirt-engine-3.6 ovirt-engine-3.6.0 ovirt-engine-3.6.1 ovirt-engine-3.6.2 ovirt-engine-3.6.3 ovirt-engine-3.5 ovirt-engine-3.4 ovirt-engine-3.3 ovirt-engine-3.5.2 ovirt-engine-3.4.0 ovirt-engine-3.3.4 ovirt-engine-3.3.3 ovirt-engine-3.3.2 ovirt-engine-3.3.1" CHECK_TARGET_RELEASE=("ovirt-engine-3.6|^3\.[6543210].*" "ovirt-engine-3.5|^3\.[543210].*" "ovirt-engine-3.4|^3\.[43210].*" "ovirt-engine-3.3|^3\.[3210].*" "ovirt-engine-3.4.1|^3.4.1$") CHECK_TARGET_MILESTONE=('ovirt-engine-3.6.0|^.*3\.6\.0.*$' 'ovirt-engine-3.6|^.*3\.6.*' 'ovirt-engine-3.5|^.*3\.5.*' 'ovirt-engine-3.4|^.*3\.4.*' 'ovirt-engine-3.3|^.*3\.3.*' 'ovirt-engine-3.4.1|^.*3.4.1.*$') PRODUCT="oVirt > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:19 PM, David Caro <dcaro(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On 01/28 16:17, Eyal Edri wrote: > > > David, > > > Is it something manual we need to change per version or we can add > > > something automatic to work on any 3.6.X branch only (exluding the 3.6 > > > branch)? > > > > Can you summarize the complete checks that should be done on the hooks > > side? Because it's starting to be a bit of a mess as we are changing > > small things each time without the complete knowledge (for example, > > the target release was being checked before when moving to MODIFIED, > > and that was commented out, and there's a hook to warn if the patch is > > not merged yet on a previous branch, like not being merged on 3.6 if > > it's on 3.6.x) > > > > > > > > > > > > e. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > This was the behavior in 3.6.2, don't know why it changed > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > >> so maybe we'll stop moving bugs to MODIFIED if they are merged on > > stable > > > >> branch (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6) and only if its merged into a version > > branch > > > >> (i.e ovirt-engine-3.6.3) ? > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Tal Nisan <tnisan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> It makes life easier for everyone when automation moves the bug to > > > >>> MODIFIED, if the work is not done then the developer can always move > > it > > > >>> back to POST like we sometimes do. > > > >>> In any way, when a 3.6.3 bug is merged in 3.6.3 it should be moved to > > > >>> MODIFIED, not a second before > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar David < > > didi(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David < > > didi(a)redhat.com > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > wrote: > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri < eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> >> > Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED, > > > >>>> >> > Now that we moved to the version branch. > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED > > > >>>> that > > > >>>> >> > we'll > > > >>>> >> > be sure its OK? > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should > > never > > > >>>> move > > > >>>> >> bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's > > indeed > > > >>>> >> ready, > > > >>>> >> or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think > > it's > > > >>>> >> safer > > > >>>> >> to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to > > > >>>> MODIFIED, > > > >>>> >> than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require > > more > > > >>>> work. > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it > > in > > > >>>> the > > > >>>> > past. > > > >>>> > This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and > > > >>>> increasing > > > >>>> > the amount of > > > >>>> > bugs that are not verified on time. > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do > > > >>>> more > > > >>>> > damage than good. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Perhaps, then, run it once a day and move to MODIFIED only if last > > patch > > > >>>> was merged at least X hours ago? Hopefully developers will not wait > > more > > > >>>> than X before pushing an additional patch for the same bug if > > needed. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Of course, we then also have to fix the issue starting current > > thread. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > e. > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan < tnisan(a)redhat.com > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >> >> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 > > > >>>> branch > > > >>>> >> >> the > > > >>>> >> >> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened > > > >>>> yesterday > > > >>>> >> >> the > > > >>>> >> >> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 > > branch > > > >>>> as > > > >>>> >> >> well > > > >>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ > > > >>>> >> >> Infra mailing list > > > >>>> >> >> Infra(a)ovirt.org > > > >>>> >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > > > >>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > -- > > > >>>> >> > Eyal Edri > > > >>>> >> > Associate Manager > > > >>>> >> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > > >>>> >> > Red Hat Israel > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > > > >>>> >> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ > > > >>>> >> > Infra mailing list > > > >>>> >> > Infra(a)ovirt.org > > > >>>> >> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> -- > > > >>>> >> Didi > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > -- > > > >>>> > Eyal Edri > > > >>>> > Associate Manager > > > >>>> > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > > >>>> > Red Hat Israel > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > phone: +972-9-7692018 > > > >>>> > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> Didi > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Eyal Edri > > > >> Associate Manager > > > >> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > > >> Red Hat Israel > > > >> > > > >> phone: +972-9-7692018 > > > >> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Eyal Edri > > > Associate Manager > > > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > > Red Hat Israel > > > > > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > > > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) > > > > -- > > David Caro > > > > Red Hat S.L. > > Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > > > > Tel.: +420 532 294 605 > > Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com > > IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} > > Web: www.redhat.com > > RHT Global #: 82-62605 > > > > > > -- > Eyal Edri > Associate Manager > EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D > Red Hat Israel > > phone: +972-9-7692018 > irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) -- David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605