[ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master (ovirt-engine) ] [ 18-10-2018 ] [ 002_bootstrap.add_hosts ]
Hi, We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies. I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue? full log is here; https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R Thanks, Dafna
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all, I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo. Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*. Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available. Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged? On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you
please
update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] -
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] -
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
adding sandron On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/
has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a failure in upgrade suite. Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues with dependencies.
I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please update on the issue?
full log is here;
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac...
My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
Thanks, Dafna
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] -
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
Any updates, still failing? On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/
has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi, > > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some > issues > with dependencies. > > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you > please > update on the issue? > > full log is here; > > > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... > > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > > Thanks, > Dafna >
Hi all,
I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*.
Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
[0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] -
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export...
> >
-- GALIT ROSENTHAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issue On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:
Any updates, still failing?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade I do see that
has both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope it would grab the correct one.
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com>
wrote:
> > Hi, > > > > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. > > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some > > issues > > with dependencies. > > > > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you > > please > > update on the issue? > > > > full log is here; > > > > > > > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... > > > > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > > > > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > > > > Thanks, > > Dafna > > > > Hi all, > > I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. > > To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ libraries,
> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. > > Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current > version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk > from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. > > Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 > - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the > failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because > it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the > *extras*. > > Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with > its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. > > Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 > with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at > [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. > > I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to > deliver: > ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig > ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos > extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
> > [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 > [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ > [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ > [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ > [4] - > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export... > > > > >
--
GALIT ROSENTHAL
SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat
galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results. thanks, Dafna On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issue
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:
Any updates, still failing?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue
> upgrade > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > has > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so > hope > it would grab the correct one. >
I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available.
Fingers crossed.
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some >> > issues >> > with dependencies. >> > >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you >> > please >> > update on the issue? >> > >> > full log is here; >> > >> > >> > >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... >> > >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> > >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dafna >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk
>> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in
in libraries, the
>> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> *extras*. >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to >> deliver: >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
>> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> [4] - >> >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export... >> >> > >> >
--
GALIT ROSENTHAL
SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat
galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ > > I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I > see results. > > thanks, > Dafna > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > >> sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help >> with the tagging issue >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Any updates, still failing? >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> adding sandron >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>>> mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>>> > not 2.10 >>>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>>> >>>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue >>>>> in >>>>> >> > upgrade >>>>> >> > I do see that >>>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>>> >> > has >>>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>>> >> > hope >>>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >>>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >>>>> >> latest one available. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>> >> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>>> deps. >>>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are >>>>> some >>>>> >> >> > issues >>>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>>> you >>>>> >> >> > please >>>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifact/upgrade-from-release-suite.el7.x86_64/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/ >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>>> libraries, >>>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >>>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>>> dpdk >>>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in >>>>> the >>>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>>> because >>>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >>>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 >>>>> with >>>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>>> ovs-2.10 >>>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log >>>>> - at >>>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we >>>>> want to >>>>> >> >> deliver: >>>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>>> centos >>>>> >> >> extra packages >>>>> >>>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>>> the ovs version >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>>> >> >> [2] - >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>>> >> >> [3] - >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>>> >> >> [4] - >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exported-artifacts/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0/_var_log/yum.log >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> GALIT ROSENTHAL >>> >>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >>> >>> Red Hat >>> >>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> >>> galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> >>
I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_change... On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/
I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results.
thanks, Dafna
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issue
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:
Any updates, still failing?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and > not 2.10 > is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in >> > upgrade >> > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >> > has >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >> > hope >> > it would grab the correct one. >> > >> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >> latest one available. >> >> Fingers crossed. >> >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some >> >> > issues >> >> > with dependencies. >> >> > >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you >> >> > please >> >> > update on the issue? >> >> > >> >> > full log is here; >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... >> >> > >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> >> > >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Dafna >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> >> *extras*. >> >> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to >> >> deliver: >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> >> extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version
>> >> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> >> [4] - >> >> >> >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >
--
GALIT ROSENTHAL
SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat
galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
+1, glad to hear that. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:32 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_change...
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/
I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results.
thanks, Dafna
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issue
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:
Any updates, still failing?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
adding sandron
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using > openvswitch2.9 and > > not 2.10 > > is that package bump merged? > > No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the > issue in > >> > upgrade > >> > I do see that > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > >> > has > >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and > dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so > >> > hope > >> > it would grab the correct one. > >> > > >> > >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that > works. > >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push > the > >> latest one available. > >> > >> Fingers crossed. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > >> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk > deps. > >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there > are some > >> >> > issues > >> >> > with dependencies. > >> >> > > >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can > you > >> >> > please > >> >> > update on the issue? > >> >> > > >> >> > full log is here; > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifac... > >> >> > > >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > >> >> > > >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Dafna > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. > >> >> > >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk > libraries, > >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. > >> >> > >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the > current > >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us > dpdk > >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. > >> >> > >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not > openvswitch 2.9 > >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled > in the > >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch > because > >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not > the > >> >> *extras*. > >> >> > >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using > ovs-2.10 with > >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. > >> >> > >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using > ovs-2.10 > >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host > yum.log - at > >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. > >> >> > >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what > we want to > >> >> deliver: > >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig > >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from > centos > >> >> extra packages > > @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump > the ovs version > > >> >> > >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 > >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ > >> >> [2] - > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ > >> >> [3] - > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ > >> >> [4] - > >> >> > >> >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/export... > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >
--
GALIT ROSENTHAL
SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat
galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>
-- Eyal edri MANAGER RHV/CNV DevOps EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
participants (4)
-
Dafna Ron -
Eyal Edri -
Galit Rosenthal -
Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso